[aur-general] perl: symbol lookup error: Util.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck
Hi, has somebody an idea what to do? I added a comment to https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/shutter-bzr/ : "I had 1272-3 from AUR 3 installed and it worked, but seemingly related to pearl upgrades it doesn't work anymore. After rebuilding from AUR 3 first and then from AUR 4 shutter still doesn't run. $ shutter /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck Rebuilding perl-scalar-list-utils from AUR 3 git fails. The PKGBUILD isn't provided by AUR 3, AUR 4 or the official repositories. $ makepkg -s --skipchecksums ==> Making package: perl-scalar-list-utils 1.38-3 (Thu Jul 9 18:02:07 CEST 2015) ==> Extracting sources... -> Extracting Scalar-List-Utils-1.38.tar.gz with bsdtar ==> Starting build()... Checking if your kit is complete... /usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build(). Aborting... $ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so is owned by perl-scalar-list-utils 1.38-2" This seems to be an issue for several apps, but the only recommendation I found by a web research was the hint to downgrade pearl packages. Regards, Ralf
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:19:50 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf@rocketmail.com> wrote:
$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so is owned by perl-scalar-list-utils 1.38-2"
Regards, Ralf
Do you need that package?
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@archlinux.info> wrote:
$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so is owned by
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:19:50 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf@rocketmail.com> wrote: perl-scalar-list-utils 1.38-2"
Regards, Ralf
Do you need that package?
perl-scalar-list-utils is now directly provided by perl 5.22.0-1 https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=199172 -- Eli Schwartz
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:48:40 -0400 Eli Schwartz <eschwartz93@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia@archlinux.info> wrote:
$ pacman -Qo /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so is owned by
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:19:50 +0200 Ralf Mardorf <info.mardorf@rocketmail.com> wrote: perl-scalar-list-utils 1.38-2"
Regards, Ralf
Do you need that package?
perl-scalar-list-utils is now directly provided by perl 5.22.0-1
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=199172
-- Eli Schwartz
Yes, I was trying to lead him to that.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:43:29 -0500, Doug Newgard wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 18:19:50 +0200 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
is owned by perl-scalar-list-utils 1.38-2
Do you need that package?
Thank you, no, seemingly I don't need it [1] and after removing it, the versions of shutter I build earlier today work, just the version from November doesn't work anymore [2]. Excepted of "pkgrel=" the PKGBUILD wasn't edited, I just build against the upgraded Arch Linux install. I deleted my comment from https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/shutter-bzr/ and right after I did it, there was a reply. I'll add a new comment and confirm that it works. Regards, Ralf [1] $ pacman -Qi perl-scalar-list-utils | grep Required Required By : perl-data-optlist $ pacman -Qi perl-data-optlist | grep Required Required By : perl-sub-exporter $ pacman -Qi perl-sub-exporter | grep Required Required By : perl-test-output $ pacman -Qi perl-test-output | grep Required Required By : None $ sudo pacman -R perl-scalar-list-utils perl-data-optlist perl-sub-exporter perl-test-output [2] $ ls -hl s* -rw-r--r-- 1 rocketmouse rocketmouse 1.6M Nov 14 2014 shutter-bzr-1272-3-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz -rw-r--r-- 1 rocketmouse rocketmouse 1.6M Jul 9 17:06 shutter-bzr-1272-4-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz -rw-r--r-- 1 rocketmouse rocketmouse 1.6M Jul 9 17:29 shutter-bzr-1272-5-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
Am 09.07.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
I deleted my comment from https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/shutter-bzr/ and right after I did it, there was a reply. I'll add a new comment and confirm that it works.
Don't delete comments just because the problem is solved for you. You also should *not* just delete a question and replace it with a comment "never mind, works for me". When you ask a question on the net you should follow up on related solutions (and post them when you get them). Even if the question seems stupid to you after you found the solution: Others might still look for the solution and get really annoyed if everybody is like "I have a solution, but I am not telling you". Or if they follow a link and they only find "nevermind" ;-) -- JonnyJD
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:11:07 +0200, Johannes Dewender wrote:
Am 09.07.2015 um 19:12 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
I deleted my comment from https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/shutter-bzr/ and right after I did it, there was a reply. I'll add a new comment and confirm that it works.
Don't delete comments just because the problem is solved for you.
I deleted it, because there was no problem, but I was mistaken regarding the perl packages.
You also should *not* just delete a question and replace it with a comment "never mind, works for me". When you ask a question on the net you should follow up on related solutions (and post them when you get them).
Even if the question seems stupid to you after you found the solution: Others might still look for the solution and get really annoyed if everybody is like "I have a solution, but I am not telling you". Or if they follow a link and they only find "nevermind" ;-)
Yesno, however, all info that is needed about the problem, the error message and what to do, is provided by the comments, just a very long, unneeded comment is removed, so if somebody will use yaourt, it by accident is now clearer than it was before I deleted my comment. "Comment by Ralf_Mardorf 2015-07-09 17:17 Sorry, I removed my comment before you replied to it. The issue is solved. https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2015-July/031174.html A copy of my original comment is also available by the list archive. Comment by PhotonX 2015-07-09 17:08 If building fails with perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/List/Util/Util.so: undefined symbol: Perl_xs_apiversion_bootcheck uninstall perl-scalar-list-utils (see also https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=199172)." - https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/shutter-bzr/
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:57:20 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Yesno, however, all info that is needed about the problem, the error message and what to do, is provided by the comments, just a very long, unneeded comment is removed, so if somebody will use yaourt, it by accident is now clearer than it was before I deleted my comment.
PS: I mentioned yaourt, because it does show comments in the terminal emulation. Sure, on the AUR 4 homepage even a long comment isn't annoying.
participants (4)
-
Doug Newgard
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Johannes Dewender
-
Ralf Mardorf