[aur-general] removal request and issue with the replacing package
Hi, I packaged two simple documentation packages: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298 They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even know build multiple binaries from a single PKGBUILD was possible. So I've merged them in a new PKGBUILD and I ask for the removal of these two obsolete ones. But then I can't upload the new source package. I get: Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed. "lpod-docs-html" was accepted so I'm surprised "lpod-docs" isn't. Here is my PKGBUILD: http://pastebin.ca/1799987 Thanks for your help, -- Hervé Cauwelier
On 18/02/10 00:08, Hervé Cauwelier wrote:
Hi,
I packaged two simple documentation packages: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34297 http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34298
They come from the same source package but at that time, I didn't even know build multiple binaries from a single PKGBUILD was possible.
So I've merged them in a new PKGBUILD and I ask for the removal of these two obsolete ones.
But then I can't upload the new source package. I get:
Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed.
"lpod-docs-html" was accepted so I'm surprised "lpod-docs" isn't.
But that is not the pkgname... pkgname=('lpod-docs-html' 'lpod-docs-pdf') Split packages are not supported by the AUR.
On 02/17/10 15:15, Allan McRae wrote:
On 18/02/10 00:08, Hervé Cauwelier wrote:
[...] But then I can't upload the new source package. I get:
Invalid name: only lowercase letters are allowed.
"lpod-docs-html" was accepted so I'm surprised "lpod-docs" isn't.
But that is not the pkgname...
pkgname=('lpod-docs-html' 'lpod-docs-pdf')
Split packages are not supported by the AUR.
Is it planned or do you recommend that I stick with separate PKGBUILDs with the same source tarball? Regards -- Hervé Cauwelier
Am Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:19:14 +0100
schrieb Hervé Cauwelier
Is it planned or do you recommend that I stick with separate PKGBUILDs with the same source tarball?
Maybe you should vote for this feature request: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16394?project=2 Greetings, Heiko
participants (3)
-
Allan McRae
-
Heiko Baums
-
Hervé Cauwelier