[aur-general] Orphans packages in community
Hi ML, there are many orphans packages into community repository. Their aren't necessary at others community's packages and I think they can be moved to unsupported. I want to know if someone is interested at these packages before I'll move they to unsupported. (4 days) Packages List: 9wm aldrin billreminder crawl cwiid gjots2 haskell-fingertree hearse hlist-darcs libzzub mhwaveedit mlt++ mlt-svn mono-addins perl-dbd-pg perl-test-longstring perl-test-pod-coverage perlio-gzip php-gtk2 pound python-pysvn pyzzub slashem striim treeline ttf-mgopen uqm w9wm -- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User: #430842
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, BaSh wrote:
Hi ML, there are many orphans packages into community repository. Their aren't necessary at others community's packages and I think they can be moved to unsupported. I want to know if someone is interested at these packages before I'll move they to unsupported. (4 days)
Packages List: 9wm aldrin billreminder crawl cwiid gjots2 haskell-fingertree hearse hlist-darcs libzzub mhwaveedit mlt++ mlt-svn mono-addins perl-dbd-pg perl-test-longstring perl-test-pod-coverage perlio-gzip php-gtk2 pound python-pysvn pyzzub slashem striim treeline ttf-mgopen uqm w9wm
mono-addins is in extra/testing. it can be removed completely -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
2008/4/5, Eric Belanger <belanger@astro.umontreal.ca>:
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, BaSh wrote: mono-addins is in extra/testing. it can be removed completely Done
-- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User: #430842
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 2:58 PM, BaSh <bash.lnx@gmail.com> wrote:
Packages List: billreminder
Adopted! -- Hugo Doria http://hdoria.archlinux-br.org
2008/4/4, BaSh <bash.lnx@gmail.com>:
9wm aldrin crawl cwiid gjots2 haskell-fingertree hearse hlist-darcs libzzub mlt++ mlt-svn perl-test-longstring perl-test-pod-coverage php-gtk2 pound python-pysvn pyzzub slashem treeline ttf-mgopen uqm w9wm Moved to unsupported
mhwaveedit striim Adopted
-- Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino Arch Linux Trusted User Linux User: #430842
On 12 Apr 2008, at 2:41 pm +0200, BaSh wrote:
2008/4/4, BaSh <bash.lnx@gmail.com>:
9wm [SNIP] w9wm Moved to unsupported
Hey, folks...FYI, I adopted these two. I'm not a TU or I would've volunteered sooner (I do want to help out, but I know non-TUs can't maintain in Community, and so I would've been glad to see one pick 'em up, but that didn't happen; oh, well). No major changes to the packages since they're pretty stable; just updated PKGBUILDs so folks wouldn't harass the old maintainer. On an unrelated note, anyone interested can find a (very preliminary) proposal for lisp packaging on the Wiki at... http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Lisp_Package_Guidelines Anyone who cares one way or the other about this should obviously feel free to improve upon it; I just thought there should be one since lisp stuff in general is often sort of very loosely distributed to begin with (a cost of flexibility, I suppose), so it can be helpful for distributors to try to impose some order. Anyway. I hope this is interpreted as helpfulness and not as hubris, 'cause that's how it's all intended, I promise. Have a nice [time of day appropriate to your timezone].
Back from London :p Now that I got about a week until my job starts, I will try to bring the x86_64 side somewhat up-to-date. I'll do the packages that have versionnumber changes before going to minor (pkgrel) changes. http://dev.archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html is what I'm going to use to track things. If anyone has any objections/comments/touch-and-you-are-dead-meat-packages/etc please respond and I see what I can do. Otherwise packages will be treated "as if they were mine" so everything to be update will be (atleast tried to be) updated For these replys to come, I shall begin tuesday (as I got loads of things to do on monday). - Mikko Seppälä (Neverth)
Mikko Seppälä wrote:
Back from London :p
Now that I got about a week until my job starts, I will try to bring the x86_64 side somewhat up-to-date. I'll do the packages that have versionnumber changes before going to minor (pkgrel) changes. http://dev.archlinux.org/~andyrtr/pkg_diff.html is what I'm going to use to track things.
If anyone has any objections/comments/touch-and-you-are-dead-meat-packages/etc please respond and I see what I can do. Otherwise packages will be treated "as if they were mine" so everything to be update will be (atleast tried to be) updated
For these replys to come, I shall begin tuesday (as I got loads of things to do on monday).
http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Community64_Status - should be of help to you. I compiled this with lots of help from Eric and have tried to keep it up to date. At the bottom it has a list of build failures for x86_64 versions. It would be great if you can add/remove things as necessary. Cheers, Allan
participants (6)
-
Allan McRae
-
BaSh
-
Eric Belanger
-
Hugo Doria
-
Ivy Foster
-
Mikko Seppälä