On 17 June 2011 10:34, Thomas Dziedzic wrote:

On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:45 PM, Martti Kühne wrote:

...

please delete pidgin-gtalkinvisible [1], I'm the maintainer and announced deprecation in favor of pidgin-gtalk-shared-status [2] a month ago.

cheers! mar77i

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30136 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48997

terminated

Hey Martti and everyone We see that Ng had uploaded the same thing before: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=38551 And this is Martti's new upload: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=48997 1. pidgin-gtalksharedstatus 2. pidgin-gtalk-shared-status Usually the new one would not be honoured, but Ng, do you think you would want to rename your package? I think a better name is following the $client-$protocol-$addon format which neither does, i.e 'pidgin-gtalk-sharedstatus'. Otherwise, if the name is not important, we'll have to remove Martti's version of the package. -- GPG/PGP ID: 8AADBB10

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: <snip>

Actually, after some consideration his naming is more appropriate, since that's the name of the source tarball is gtalk-shared-status. I would like my package renamed to that name, though I would not object to deleting my package and leaving his one, as long as he can maintain it.

Ng, I'm not actually using the package. If you are, it's a much better deal if you maintain it, unless you're too busy with the rest of the universe.

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Ray Rashif wrote:

On 17 June 2011 20:56, Martti Kühne wrote:

...

On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Oon-Ee Ng wrote: <snip>

...

Actually, after some consideration his naming is more appropriate, since that's the name of the source tarball is gtalk-shared-status. I would like my package renamed to that name, though I would not object to deleting my package and leaving his one, as long as he can maintain it.

Ng, I'm not actually using the package. If you are, it's a much better deal if you maintain it, unless you're too busy with the rest of the universe.

That's great. You can disown for Ng to pick it up. When that happens, let us know and we'll remove the other package.

Yes I do use it, please disown.