Hi all,
I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's developer status.
Currently Ray is the maintainer of 60 packages in [community] and [extra], of which none are actively maintained by him (for years). Ray's last action as a community member (in archweb) has been on '2019-03-12 12:50'. The account 'schivmeister' doesn't maintain any packages in the AUR and the last login in aurweb was on '2019-03-12'. However, the last counted Trusted User vote is number 117 (current vote: 118).
The voting procedure will commence after seven days of discussion period, in which Ray can state his case.
Bests, David
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html#_special_removal_of_an_...
On 08.10.19 14:35, David Runge wrote:
Hi all,
I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's developer status.
Currently Ray is the maintainer of 60 packages in [community] and [extra], of which none are actively maintained by him (for years). Ray's last action as a community member (in archweb) has been on '2019-03-12 12:50'. The account 'schivmeister' doesn't maintain any packages in the AUR and the last login in aurweb was on '2019-03-12'. However, the last counted Trusted User vote is number 117 (current vote: 118).
The voting procedure will commence after seven days of discussion period, in which Ray can state his case.
Bests, David
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html#_special_removal_of_an_...
+1
Em outubro 8, 2019 9:35 David Runge escreveu:
The voting procedure will commence after seven days of discussion period, in which Ray can state his case.
I believe that the discussion period for removal by inactivity is 3 days, not 7. The voting period is 5 days.
Other than that, the current proposal is 119, but it has not ended yet. If, during the discussion period, Ray ends up voting on that one, we'll have to stop this process.
Regards, Giancarlo Razzolini
Hey Giancarlo,
On 2019-10-08 10:41:44 (-0300), Giancarlo Razzolini via aur-general wrote:
I believe that the discussion period for removal by inactivity is 3 days, not 7. The voting period is 5 days.
Correct, somehow I had the 'Removal of a TU' rules in mind when writing the mail.
Other than that, the current proposal is 119, but it has not ended yet.
True, I misinterpreted the 'Last vote' column.
If, during the discussion period, Ray ends up voting on that one, we'll have to stop this process.
How so? Not only are all three points matching, but also is voting (as far as I understand the bylaws) specifically excluded as required action (so we don't just have voters but no doers) in the first half of the statement. The first half of the statement is therefore true, no matter if Ray votes or not.
Bests, David
On 2019-10-08 14:35:22 (+0200), David Runge wrote:
I would like to start the discussion period for a Trusted User removal of Ray 'schiv' Rashif on the grounds of 'Special Removal of an Inactive TU' [1]. Note, that this is separate from any motion in regards to Ray's developer status.
In accordance to the bylaws a vote has now been started: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=120
Best, David
On 2019-10-11 14:44:27 (+0200), David Runge wrote:
In accordance to the bylaws a vote has now been started: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=120
The results are in:
Yes: 36 No: 7 Abstain: 6 Total: 49 Participation: 87.50%
The quorum of 66% has been reached with a larger number of "Yes", than "No" votes.
This means Ray Rashif is no longer a Trusted User.
On behalf of the team I would like to thank Ray for his dedication towards the community and distribution over the years.
I hope that his time permits further involvement in the future. :)
Bests, David
Sorry folks, I should have probably sent in a resignation for this. I have also made unfulfilled promises as a developer and never sent in an inactivity declaration in the hopes of getting back to Arch/Linux once I have a new computer. As funny as it sounds my undeclared inactivity is as long as this current machine ~3-4 years and a purchase has been pending since last year but keeps getting down-prioritized due to $$ requirements elsewhere in RL.
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 22:30, David Runge dave@sleepmap.de wrote:
On 2019-10-11 14:44:27 (+0200), David Runge wrote:
In accordance to the bylaws a vote has now been started: https://aur.archlinux.org/tu/?id=120
The results are in:
Yes: 36 No: 7 Abstain: 6 Total: 49 Participation: 87.50%
The quorum of 66% has been reached with a larger number of "Yes", than "No" votes.
This means Ray Rashif is no longer a Trusted User.
On behalf of the team I would like to thank Ray for his dedication towards the community and distribution over the years.
I hope that his time permits further involvement in the future. :)
Bests, David
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org