[aur-general] [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR?
Please start threads regarding [community] packages on aur-general so that other TUs can respond. I didn't notice I was replying to arch-dev-public and got my message bounced. :) ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR? To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development <arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) <ghost1227@archlinux.us> wrote:
I'm currently maintaining raggle, which has been abandoned upstream for some time. The recent rebuild of ruby broke it horribly and thus far I have been unable to patch it in such a way that it functions as expected. I hate to remove this package as it seems to be quite popular, but given its condition and upstream status, I think removal to AUR is best unless someone else can provide a working patch. Thoughts? --
It doesn't seem to be popular; it has 0.29% usage according to pkgstats. I'd say drop it. :)
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 01:24:45 +0300 Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> wrote:
It doesn't seem to be popular; it has 0.29% usage according to pkgstats.
I'd say drop it. :) I agree. -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4
On 04/10/10 at 01:24am, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
Please start threads regarding [community] packages on aur-general so that other TUs can respond. I didn't notice I was replying to arch-dev-public and got my message bounced. :)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis@gmail.com> Date: Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:18 AM Subject: Re: [arch-dev-public] raggle: drop pkg to AUR? To: Public mailing list for Arch Linux development <arch-dev-public@archlinux.org>
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:13 AM, Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227) <ghost1227@archlinux.us> wrote:
I'm currently maintaining raggle, which has been abandoned upstream for some time. The recent rebuild of ruby broke it horribly and thus far I have been unable to patch it in such a way that it functions as expected. I hate to remove this package as it seems to be quite popular, but given its condition and upstream status, I think removal to AUR is best unless someone else can provide a working patch. Thoughts? --
It doesn't seem to be popular; it has 0.29% usage according to pkgstats.
I'd say drop it. :) My bad... Honestly forgot I was sending to arch-dev-public. :P --
participants (3)
-
Daniel J Griffiths (Ghost1227)
-
Evangelos Foutras
-
Thorsten Töpper