[aur-general] 2 merge requests
Hi Guys, This is Maciek, 1st time on this ML. I adopted 2 packages - grass-geos and grass-trunk. Can I request merging them into my grass64 and grass70-svn, respectively? Original maintainers (CCed) are OK with this. Maciek -- Maciej Sieczka http://www.sieczka.org
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 17:08:24 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
Hi Guys,
This is Maciek, 1st time on this ML.
I adopted 2 packages - grass-geos and grass-trunk. Can I request merging them into my grass64 and grass70-svn, respectively? Original maintainers (CCed) are OK with this.
Maciek
Merged grass-geos into grass64. There's already a package named grass7-svn, should we consider grass70-svn a dup if there's not much difference? btw, please include links to packages next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan
W dniu 17.01.2014 05:25, Felix Yan pisze:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 17:08:24 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
I adopted 2 packages - grass-geos and grass-trunk. Can I request merging them into my grass64 and grass70-svn, respectively? Original maintainers (CCed) are OK with this.
Merged grass-geos into grass64.
Kewl!
There's already a package named grass7-svn, should we consider grass70-svn a dup if there's not much difference?
grass70-svn is more feature rich [1], doesn't mess with the source code to enforce python2, but uses a (more) fool-proof trick [2] that also supports GRASS Python addons without extra patching, handles FORTIFY_SOURCE CPPFLAGS issue at configure more gracefully etc. It even has a nicer 64 pix icon ;). All my other GRASS packages (grass64, grass64-rc, grass64-svn, grass65-svn) use a similar, consistent set of build options. They don't conflict with each other at installation time (they normally would) to have full spectrum of stable and devel GRASS versions alongside for daily work and for easy access to new features, and bug hunting. I advertised them on the official GRASS GIS download page [3]. There've been no complaints. I used to be a proffesional GRASS user, and a contributor a bit as well, for some years. I still keep an eye on the project for a hobby. I would like to keep maintaining a complete suit of GRASS packages, if this doesn't pose a problem for anyone.
btw, please include links to packages next time, thanks.
Right. Maciek [1] liblas, netcdf, odbc, openmp, pthreads [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr/grass70-svn/PKGBUILD. [3] http://grass.osgeo.org/download/software/linux/ -- Maciej Sieczka http://www.sieczka.org
On Friday 17 January 2014 at 18:43:27, Maciej wrote:
W dniu 17.01.2014 05:25, Felix Yan pisze:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 17:08:24 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
I adopted 2 packages - grass-geos and grass-trunk. Can I request merging them into my grass64 and grass70-svn, respectively? Original maintainers (CCed) are OK with this.
Merged grass-geos into grass64.
Kewl!
There's already a package named grass7-svn, should we consider grass70-svn a dup if there's not much difference?
grass70-svn is more feature rich [1], doesn't mess with the source code to enforce python2, but uses a (more) fool-proof trick [2] that also supports GRASS Python addons without extra patching, handles FORTIFY_SOURCE CPPFLAGS issue at configure more gracefully etc. It even has a nicer 64 pix icon ;).
All my other GRASS packages (grass64, grass64-rc, grass64-svn, grass65-svn) use a similar, consistent set of build options.
They don't conflict with each other at installation time (they normally would) to have full spectrum of stable and devel GRASS versions alongside for daily work and for easy access to new features, and bug hunting.
I advertised them on the official GRASS GIS download page [3]. There've been no complaints.
I used to be a proffesional GRASS user, and a contributor a bit as well, for some years. I still keep an eye on the project for a hobby.
I would like to keep maintaining a complete suit of GRASS packages, if this doesn't pose a problem for anyone.
btw, please include links to packages next time, thanks.
Right.
Maciek
[1] liblas, netcdf, odbc, openmp, pthreads [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr/grass70-svn/PKGBUILD. [3] http://grass.osgeo.org/download/software/linux/
Hi! Just a side-note of a side-walker :) One of the most sophisticated/commented PKGBUILDs I've seen (the most sophisticated is core/linux, of course)... - it's better to use prepare() for patching and so on, so in build() there is only ./configure and make calls; - you could use $( ... ) instead of ` ... `. Bash lists the latter as old- style, however, this is non-critical, just more uptodate and beautiful IMO; - I'd rather use sed on an installed copy of the *.desktop file: patching source files in package() can (theoretically) break multiple repackagings with `makepkg -R`. Cheers! -- Ivan Shapovalov / intelfx /
On Friday, January 17, 2014 18:43:27 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
W dniu 17.01.2014 05:25, Felix Yan pisze:
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 17:08:24 Maciej Sieczka wrote:
I adopted 2 packages - grass-geos and grass-trunk. Can I request merging them into my grass64 and grass70-svn, respectively? Original maintainers (CCed) are OK with this.
Merged grass-geos into grass64.
Kewl!
There's already a package named grass7-svn, should we consider grass70-svn a dup if there's not much difference?
grass70-svn is more feature rich [1], doesn't mess with the source code to enforce python2, but uses a (more) fool-proof trick [2] that also supports GRASS Python addons without extra patching, handles FORTIFY_SOURCE CPPFLAGS issue at configure more gracefully etc. It even has a nicer 64 pix icon ;).
All my other GRASS packages (grass64, grass64-rc, grass64-svn, grass65-svn) use a similar, consistent set of build options.
They don't conflict with each other at installation time (they normally would) to have full spectrum of stable and devel GRASS versions alongside for daily work and for easy access to new features, and bug hunting.
I advertised them on the official GRASS GIS download page [3]. There've been no complaints.
I used to be a proffesional GRASS user, and a contributor a bit as well, for some years. I still keep an eye on the project for a hobby.
I would like to keep maintaining a complete suit of GRASS packages, if this doesn't pose a problem for anyone.
btw, please include links to packages next time, thanks.
Right.
Maciek
[1] liblas, netcdf, odbc, openmp, pthreads [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gr/grass70-svn/PKGBUILD. [3] http://grass.osgeo.org/download/software/linux/
Okay, merged grass-trunk into grass70-svn. However, I still suggest to contact the current maintainer of grass7-svn if there's no significant difference in the current two packages, and we may get them merged too. Regards, Felix Yan
W dniu 20.01.2014 06:14, Felix Yan pisze:
Okay, merged grass-trunk into grass70-svn.
However, I still suggest to contact the current maintainer of grass7-svn if there's no significant difference in the current two packages, and we may get them merged too.
I'll shoot him an email. Maciek -- Maciej Sieczka http://www.sieczka.org
participants (3)
-
Felix Yan
-
Ivan Shapovalov
-
Maciej Sieczka