Re: [aur-general] Firefox without signature
What gona happend with all the AddOns for Firefox on Arch, as far for example the official arch-firefox-search [1] Also this mean now Devs need to take from the Firefox webpage the plusings due to the signing instead of build them by theyself? so now firefox-adblockplus [2] [3] and so far checking and all the other addons on the official repo are signed but only available from Firefox page. Should do I submit bugs to all those about take the signed package from Firefox page instead the one not signed like raismth [4]? [1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/arch-firefox-search/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firefox-adblock-plus/ [3] https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=40464 [4] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=... -- *Pablo Lezaeta*
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 00:12:40 -0300 Pablo Lezaeta Reyes <prflr88@gmail.com> wrote:
What gona happend with all the AddOns for Firefox on Arch, as far for example the official arch-firefox-search [1]
Also this mean now Devs need to take from the Firefox webpage the plusings due to the signing instead of build them by theyself? so now firefox-adblockplus [2] [3] and so far checking and all the other addons on the official repo are signed but only available from Firefox page.
Should do I submit bugs to all those about take the signed package from Firefox page instead the one not signed like raismth [4]?
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/arch-firefox-search/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/any/firefox-adblock-plus/ [3] https://adblockplus.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=40464 [4] https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/community.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=...
participants (2)
-
Doug Newgard
-
Pablo Lezaeta Reyes