[aur-general] Not the way to go: teamviewer and teamviewer-stable
I noticed that tlm created teamviewer-stable package since, in his opinion Hilinus, the current maintainer of Teamviewer isn't doing a good job. I think this is not the way it should go. In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues. The current way creates a mess in the AUR. See this comment on Teamviewer: Comment by: tlm on Mon, 28 May 2012 13:56:52 +0000 This package is out of date and seems the maintainer doesn't care. I've uploaded a "teamviewer-stable" package. Please use that instead. Greets, Christian.
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes later tlm uploaded the new one. We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead. [1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02 +0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=59577 -- Andrea
Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues. Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes later tlm uploaded the new one. We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02 +0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by tlm is 7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer. -- Christian Stadegaart
Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often (more than I'd like). 2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart <e-mail@bewust-leven.nl>:
Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues.
Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes later tlm uploaded the new one. We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02 +0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by tlm is 7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer.
-- Christian Stadegaart
-- "La envidia es causada por ver a otro gozar de lo que deseamos; los celos, por ver a otro poseer lo que quisiéramos poseer nosotros". Diógenes Laercio (S. III AC-?) Historiador griego.
Have you guys been in touch with him yet? I'm sure someone else will gladly take over the package if he's no longer interested Federico Cinelli @ 213.985.9643 CINELLI Motorsports LLC CINELLI Thoughts @ http://www.CINELLIthoughts.com/ Stay true. On 05/28/2012 06:03 PM, José Valecillos wrote:
Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often (more than I'd like).
2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart<e-mail@bewust-leven.nl>:
Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues. Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes later tlm uploaded the new one. We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02 +0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by tlm is 7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer.
-- Christian Stadegaart
Dinsdag 29 Mei 2012 om 04:30 (CEST +0200) schreef Federico Cinelli:
Have you guys been in touch with him yet? I'm sure someone else will gladly take over the package if he's no longer interested
Federico Cinelli @ 213.985.9643 CINELLI Motorsports LLC CINELLI Thoughts @ http://www.CINELLIthoughts.com/ Stay true.
On 05/28/2012 06:03 PM, José Valecillos wrote:
Is stupid, he is just eagerness for take over the package. I use teamviewer and the current maintainer update the package very often (more than I'd like).
2012/5/28 Christian Stadegaart <e-mail@bewust-leven.nl>:
Maandag 28 Mei 2012 om 21:41 (CEST +0200) schreef Andrea Scarpino:
On Monday 28 May 2012 20:57:58 Christian Stadegaart wrote:
In my opinion, if Hilinus isn't maintaining properly, the package should be orphaned and then maintained by someone else, perhaps tlm. There probably is a standard protocol for these kind of issues. Someone flagged the package as out-of-date at 13:34 GMT[1], and 20 minutes later tlm uploaded the new one. We should probably delete tlm's package[2] instead.
[1] "This package has been flagged out of date. (Mon, 28 May 2012 13:34:02 +0000)" https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=36481
I agree, the older package is version 7.0.9348-1, the newer one by tlm is 7.0.9350-3, which is just slightly newer.
-- Christian Stadegaart
Guys / gals, Can someone with administrative power either merge these two packages or delete tlm's package instead? These two packages will confuse (new) AUR/Teamviewer users and Hilinus' package was always and is updated just fine. Thanks! -- Christian Stadegaart
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Christian Stadegaart <e-mail@bewust-leven.nl> wrote:
I noticed that tlm created teamviewer-stable package since, in his opinion Hilinus, the current maintainer of Teamviewer isn't doing a good job.
I removed tlm package. Everyone seems happy with the current maintainer. -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
Donderdag 31 Mei 2012 om 22:45 (CEST +0200) schreef Seblu:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Christian Stadegaart <e-mail@bewust-leven.nl> wrote:
I noticed that tlm created teamviewer-stable package since, in his opinion Hilinus, the current maintainer of Teamviewer isn't doing a good job.
I removed tlm package. Everyone seems happy with the current maintainer.
Thank you! -- Christian Stadegaart
participants (5)
-
Andrea Scarpino
-
Christian Stadegaart
-
Federico Cinelli
-
José Valecillos
-
Seblu