virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote:
virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
Why?
On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote:
On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote:
virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
Why?
I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner of the package and it seems actively maintained.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa jelle@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote:
On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote:
virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49288http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288
Why?
I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner
of the package and it seems actively maintained.
It does not prevent him from giving a reason but he does seems to be the maintainer and the package has seen no update since its creation.
On 07/22/2011 05:23 PM, Cédric Girard wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waajelle@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote:
On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote:
virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49288http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288
Why?
I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner
of the package and it seems actively maintained.
It does not prevent him from giving a reason but he does seems to be the maintainer and the package has seen no update since its creation.
ohwait, i clicked the wrong link, he is the maintainer.
Sorry, this PKGBUILD is not right (too inefficient) and I would rather wait for the new linux-ck naming scheme to work on it. I can reupload the renamed version later on.
2011/7/22 Cédric Girard girard.cedric@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Jelle van der Waa jelle@vdwaa.nl wrote:
On 07/22/2011 04:37 PM, cantabile wrote:
On 07/22/2011 02:36 PM, member graysky wrote:
virtualbox-guest-modules-ck
http://aur.archlinux.org/**packages.php?ID=49288http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=49288
Why?
I would like to know the real reason too, you don't seem like the owner
of the package and it seems actively maintained.
It does not prevent him from giving a reason but he does seems to be the maintainer and the package has seen no update since its creation.
-- Cédric Girard
On 22 July 2011 19:55, member graysky graysky@archlinux.us wrote:
Sorry, this PKGBUILD is not right (too inefficient) and I would rather wait for the new linux-ck naming scheme to work on it. I can reupload the renamed version later on.
OK, removed
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org