[aur-general] pending merge request for python-git/python-gitpython, please cancel
i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED. They need to be separate packages. they are for different things. PRQ # is 7484 Sorry for the confusion
Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit :
i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git
THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED.
They need to be separate packages. they are for different things.
PRQ # is 7484
Sorry for the confusion
Please note that PRQs have they own list at https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/aur-requests, where they should be discussed when needed. That being said, I’ve tried to understand the differences between both packages, and if indeed python-gitpython shouldn’t be merged into python-git, this last one is currently building the GitPython 2.1.1 module instead of python from git (3.7.xxx), and that should be changed. You should either take care of or orphan it. Cheers, Bruno
Le 14/02/2017 à 12:11, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit :
i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git
THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED.
They need to be separate packages. they are for different things.
PRQ # is 7484
Sorry for the confusion Please note that PRQs have they own list at https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/aur-requests, where they should be discussed when needed.
That being said, I’ve tried to understand the differences between both packages, and if indeed python-gitpython shouldn’t be merged into python-git, this last one is currently building the GitPython 2.1.1 module instead of python from git (3.7.xxx), and that should be changed. You should either take care of or orphan it.
Cheers, Bruno
Also, you should make python-gitpython a split PKGBUILD to also provide python2-gitpython as the current python-git package provides.
Dne 14.2.2017 v 12:14 Bruno Pagani via aur-general napsal(a):
Le 14/02/2017 à 12:11, Bruno Pagani a écrit :
Le 13/02/2017 à 17:03, brent timothy saner via aur-general a écrit :
i requested a merge of python-gitpython into python-git
THIS SHOULD BE CANCELED.
They need to be separate packages. they are for different things.
PRQ # is 7484
Sorry for the confusion Please note that PRQs have they own list at https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/aur-requests, where they should be discussed when needed.
That being said, I’ve tried to understand the differences between both packages, and if indeed python-gitpython shouldn’t be merged into python-git, this last one is currently building the GitPython 2.1.1 module instead of python from git (3.7.xxx), and that should be changed. You should either take care of or orphan it.
Cheers, Bruno Also, you should make python-gitpython a split PKGBUILD to also provide python2-gitpython as the current python-git package provides.
Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git. Daniel [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-hg/
Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git.
If the sources are in a Mercurial repository, the package should be -hg, not -git. But speaking of python-hg... it points to a cpython repository, so maybe it should really be cpython-hg? Oh boy! What a mess. :) -- Namasté, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen https://freso.dk/ AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Freso Wiki: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/User:Freso
Dne 14.2.2017 v 14:50 Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen napsal(a):
Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git. If the sources are in a Mercurial repository, the package should be -hg, not -git. But speaking of python-hg... it points to a cpython repository, so maybe it should really be cpython-hg?
Oh boy! What a mess. :)
Cpython sources are moved to github now. Yes, if python and python2 packages are renamed to cpython, then python-hg/git should be also renamed :) Daniel
Le 14/02/2017 à 14:56, Daniel Milde a écrit :
Dne 14.2.2017 v 14:50 Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen napsal(a):
Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git. If the sources are in a Mercurial repository, the package should be -hg, not -git. But speaking of python-hg... it points to a cpython repository, so maybe it should really be cpython-hg?
Oh boy! What a mess. :) Cpython sources are moved to github now.
Yes, if python and python2 packages are renamed to cpython, then python-hg/git should be also renamed :)
Daniel
Just to be clear for Freso and other people that might be tricked into that: cpython is upstream name for the standard reference python interpreter itself (absolutely not an expert in this area, but I would bet that’s because this is a C implementation of python). The repo was indeed in mercurial, but as you can see here https://docs.python.org/devguide/ or here https://docs.python.org/devguide/setup.html#checkout, it’s now https://github.com/python/cpython. So yes, there’s a bit of cleaning to be done regarding this in AUR. Regards, Bruno
On 02/14/2017 08:50 AM, Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen wrote:
Den 14-02-2017 kl. 12:19 skrev Daniel Milde:
Yes, python-git should be probably renamed to something like python-gitlib and python-hg[1] should be renamed to python-git.
If the sources are in a Mercurial repository, the package should be -hg, not -git. But speaking of python-hg... it points to a cpython repository, so maybe it should really be cpython-hg?
Oh boy! What a mess. :)
Just like [extra]/python and [extra]/python2, this is the package for the default C implementation of Python. What is your point? -- Eli Schwartz
participants (5)
-
brent timothy saner
-
Bruno Pagani
-
Daniel Milde
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Frederik “Freso” S. Olesen