[aur-general] Slight Modification to core package?
Hello everyone, I wasn't sure where to ask this, but here goes: Apparently the core sudo package is not compiled with the sssd flags. Since i need to recompile the package with sssd support, would I just upload the "sudo-sssd" package (or whatever i end up calling it), to the aur, or is there some more official way of going about this? NM
On 7/8/2015 9:11 PM, Nick Milosevic wrote:
Hello everyone,
I wasn't sure where to ask this, but here goes:
Apparently the core sudo package is not compiled with the sssd flags. Since i need to recompile the package with sssd support, would I just upload the "sudo-sssd" package (or whatever i end up calling it), to the aur, or is there some more official way of going about this?
NM
You should look at [1] for naming. Past that, I thing sudo-sssd is an appropriate name. Mark Weiman (markzz) [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards#Package_naming
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 07/08/2015 09:29 PM, Mark Weiman wrote:
On 7/8/2015 9:11 PM, Nick Milosevic wrote:
Hello everyone,
I wasn't sure where to ask this, but here goes:
Apparently the core sudo package is not compiled with the sssd flags. Since i need to recompile the package with sssd support, would I just upload the "sudo-sssd" package (or whatever i end up calling it), to the aur, or is there some more official way of going about this?
NM
You should look at [1] for naming. Past that, I thing sudo-sssd is an appropriate name.
Mark Weiman (markzz)
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards#Package_naming
Just my $0.02 but this may be a better case for ABS[0] and amending a section to the sudo wiki article[1] (specifically, the "Tips and Tricks"[2] section). That way we won't get multiple <repo package>-* in AUR. Just a thought. :) Whichever route you choose, don't forge to add sudo to the "provides" array. [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Build_System [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sudo [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sudo#Tips_and_tricks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVnePKAAoJEIwATC+TSB9rV0QP/RgqTggGc4VG+Ly42+x+6GH6 jIl0Ka1vBHYnHORYPtQJ7GDt1KbxU2VGlMjEkk3WUdtRaud0bocxCUQ5QN1TmTUU PT+uh6LJHdRmxBlDd3PolADni4z5OwE0lNwwFstV50SY0PshUCMA3pOJWR0c0sdK YrKlfwHw0PT0SybbEvFAX+c4L55hhQZniCPW600TL8U9y5eua7joawH730ZxnQHS +WCK8MTCfCebAU6hYb8A7MjxdWb3fcqUoT1OQBaLoDa/iJtTO+oPII5UIb/4BfDm QNfJSklyFEEK6MFbnPrzbEbUUfWKZQnFStLKFllj5MfahB5HF5UWI2OTEleKLfmD +k1BU3ZeOAJNBYucXQjtovG1LQqeHPA/7XU7Au7scvbo//+npUd2rp6P7FxlC7JK IvnRuYTZxEG/aDtha0LEmdRPsuAJG8p6eu9u9BF/Qxw8KYkjW13rThDeboRZFbVQ 2dLszsnsumjJWd27J0J2XegTRBGge9ZPhvZLcuj8sv/ERFh9zUgcbYkIDRnL8Hhm 58ahrF5trRNiHlBELyfG3bXWBVhJKwjPkqLA1PeVo94DlNcl+waptyNs0SYxK/nB AZduGFEOgn6LUKhrqFXWzbr+il4ct1ld56+j2wygmXzn9i5Vr2ScCjxNqHvVOcDV YXgndmzMGeBDwBxPm8Vo =B9gF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
fresh out of the oven[1] [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/sudo-sssd/ NM On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:00 PM, brent timothy saner <brent.saner@gmail.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 07/08/2015 09:29 PM, Mark Weiman wrote:
On 7/8/2015 9:11 PM, Nick Milosevic wrote:
Hello everyone,
I wasn't sure where to ask this, but here goes:
Apparently the core sudo package is not compiled with the sssd flags.
i need to recompile the package with sssd support, would I just upload
Since the
"sudo-sssd" package (or whatever i end up calling it), to the aur, or is there some more official way of going about this?
NM
You should look at [1] for naming. Past that, I thing sudo-sssd is an appropriate name.
Mark Weiman (markzz)
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards#Package_naming
Just my $0.02 but this may be a better case for ABS[0] and amending a section to the sudo wiki article[1] (specifically, the "Tips and Tricks"[2] section). That way we won't get multiple <repo package>-* in AUR. Just a thought. :)
Whichever route you choose, don't forge to add sudo to the "provides" array.
[0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Build_System [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sudo [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sudo#Tips_and_tricks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVnePKAAoJEIwATC+TSB9rV0QP/RgqTggGc4VG+Ly42+x+6GH6 jIl0Ka1vBHYnHORYPtQJ7GDt1KbxU2VGlMjEkk3WUdtRaud0bocxCUQ5QN1TmTUU PT+uh6LJHdRmxBlDd3PolADni4z5OwE0lNwwFstV50SY0PshUCMA3pOJWR0c0sdK YrKlfwHw0PT0SybbEvFAX+c4L55hhQZniCPW600TL8U9y5eua7joawH730ZxnQHS +WCK8MTCfCebAU6hYb8A7MjxdWb3fcqUoT1OQBaLoDa/iJtTO+oPII5UIb/4BfDm QNfJSklyFEEK6MFbnPrzbEbUUfWKZQnFStLKFllj5MfahB5HF5UWI2OTEleKLfmD +k1BU3ZeOAJNBYucXQjtovG1LQqeHPA/7XU7Au7scvbo//+npUd2rp6P7FxlC7JK IvnRuYTZxEG/aDtha0LEmdRPsuAJG8p6eu9u9BF/Qxw8KYkjW13rThDeboRZFbVQ 2dLszsnsumjJWd27J0J2XegTRBGge9ZPhvZLcuj8sv/ERFh9zUgcbYkIDRnL8Hhm 58ahrF5trRNiHlBELyfG3bXWBVhJKwjPkqLA1PeVo94DlNcl+waptyNs0SYxK/nB AZduGFEOgn6LUKhrqFXWzbr+il4ct1ld56+j2wygmXzn9i5Vr2ScCjxNqHvVOcDV YXgndmzMGeBDwBxPm8Vo =B9gF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
So it looks like the official package now has sssd support, so this package should no longer be needed. Can we remove sudo-sssd [1] from the aur? [1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/sudo-sssd/ NM On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Nick Milosevic <nick000@gmail.com> wrote:
fresh out of the oven[1]
[1] https://aur4.archlinux.org/packages/sudo-sssd/
NM
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 8:00 PM, brent timothy saner <brent.saner@gmail.com
wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
On 07/08/2015 09:29 PM, Mark Weiman wrote:
On 7/8/2015 9:11 PM, Nick Milosevic wrote:
Hello everyone,
I wasn't sure where to ask this, but here goes:
Apparently the core sudo package is not compiled with the sssd flags.
i need to recompile the package with sssd support, would I just upload
Since the
"sudo-sssd" package (or whatever i end up calling it), to the aur, or is there some more official way of going about this?
NM
You should look at [1] for naming. Past that, I thing sudo-sssd is an appropriate name.
Mark Weiman (markzz)
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_packaging_standards#Package_naming
Just my $0.02 but this may be a better case for ABS[0] and amending a section to the sudo wiki article[1] (specifically, the "Tips and Tricks"[2] section). That way we won't get multiple <repo package>-* in AUR. Just a thought. :)
Whichever route you choose, don't forge to add sudo to the "provides" array.
[0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Build_System [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sudo [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Sudo#Tips_and_tricks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVnePKAAoJEIwATC+TSB9rV0QP/RgqTggGc4VG+Ly42+x+6GH6 jIl0Ka1vBHYnHORYPtQJ7GDt1KbxU2VGlMjEkk3WUdtRaud0bocxCUQ5QN1TmTUU PT+uh6LJHdRmxBlDd3PolADni4z5OwE0lNwwFstV50SY0PshUCMA3pOJWR0c0sdK YrKlfwHw0PT0SybbEvFAX+c4L55hhQZniCPW600TL8U9y5eua7joawH730ZxnQHS +WCK8MTCfCebAU6hYb8A7MjxdWb3fcqUoT1OQBaLoDa/iJtTO+oPII5UIb/4BfDm QNfJSklyFEEK6MFbnPrzbEbUUfWKZQnFStLKFllj5MfahB5HF5UWI2OTEleKLfmD +k1BU3ZeOAJNBYucXQjtovG1LQqeHPA/7XU7Au7scvbo//+npUd2rp6P7FxlC7JK IvnRuYTZxEG/aDtha0LEmdRPsuAJG8p6eu9u9BF/Qxw8KYkjW13rThDeboRZFbVQ 2dLszsnsumjJWd27J0J2XegTRBGge9ZPhvZLcuj8sv/ERFh9zUgcbYkIDRnL8Hhm 58ahrF5trRNiHlBELyfG3bXWBVhJKwjPkqLA1PeVo94DlNcl+waptyNs0SYxK/nB AZduGFEOgn6LUKhrqFXWzbr+il4ct1ld56+j2wygmXzn9i5Vr2ScCjxNqHvVOcDV YXgndmzMGeBDwBxPm8Vo =B9gF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
* Nick Milosevic <nick000@gmail.com> (Mon, 20 Jul 2015 14:26:58 -0700):
So it looks like the official package now has sssd support, so this package should no longer be needed. Can we remove sudo-sssd [1] from the aur?
Please use the File Request link on the package page. Best, Marcel
participants (4)
-
brent timothy saner
-
Marcel Korpel
-
Mark Weiman
-
Nick Milosevic