[aur-general] about hal removing
Hi, it looks synce-odccm and thoggen hardly depend on hal. I suggest move it to community instead of removing.
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:06:51PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Hi,
it looks synce-odccm and thoggen hardly depend on hal. I suggest move it to community instead of removing.
How about contacting upstream and dropping synce-odccm and thoggen as well if there's no easy way to make them work without hal? Both of them have a usage of less than 2% according to pkgstats and are not required by any other packages. -1 to keeping deprecated hal.
Le Mercredi 3 Août 2011 14:17:19, Lukas Fleischer a écrit :
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:06:51PM +0400, Sergej Pupykin wrote:
Hi,
it looks synce-odccm and thoggen hardly depend on hal. I suggest move it to community instead of removing.
How about contacting upstream and dropping synce-odccm and thoggen as well if there's no easy way to make them work without hal? Both of them have a usage of less than 2% according to pkgstats and are not required by any other packages. -1 to keeping deprecated hal.
Agreed totally; we should remove hal and related packages. ++
participants (3)
-
Laurent Carlier
-
Lukas Fleischer
-
Sergej Pupykin