Hello everyone!
I've updated GraphicsMagick PKGBUILD to the version 1.3.12. Can anyone check it and update the package in extra repository?
Also I have a question about perl bindings fot this package. Now they are included in the package. Maybe it will be better to make PKGBUILD that produces two packages: graphicsmagick and perl-graphics-magick? Or this is completely unnecessary?
Thanks,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Anton Leontiev bunder@t-25.ru wrote:
Hello everyone!
I've updated GraphicsMagick PKGBUILD to the version 1.3.12. Can anyone check it and update the package in extra repository?
Please don't. Last time I checked octave didn't build against the new graphicsmagick package. I have to check into that first before updating the package.
Also I have a question about perl bindings fot this package. Now they are included in the package. Maybe it will be better to make PKGBUILD that produces two packages: graphicsmagick and perl-graphics-magick? Or this is completely unnecessary?
I doubt it's really needed, but it much depends on size of the perl bindings and the rest of the package and the dependency chain of the packages that depend on it. Do you have any numbers on size?
Ronald
В Сбт, 27/03/2010 в 18:39 +0100, Ronald van Haren пишет:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Anton Leontiev bunder@t-25.ru wrote:
Hello everyone!
I've updated GraphicsMagick PKGBUILD to the version 1.3.12. Can anyone check it and update the package in extra repository?
Please don't. Last time I checked octave didn't build against the new graphicsmagick package. I have to check into that first before updating the package.
Ok. Then can you just add perl bindings to the existing package?
Also I have a question about perl bindings fot this package. Now they are included in the package. Maybe it will be better to make PKGBUILD that produces two packages: graphicsmagick and perl-graphics-magick? Or this is completely unnecessary?
I doubt it's really needed, but it much depends on size of the perl bindings and the rest of the package and the dependency chain of the packages that depend on it. Do you have any numbers on size?
GraphicsMagick ~18 Mb Perl bindings ~244 kB Ok, I see, from this point of view it seems unnecessary to split packages.
Thanks for explanation.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Anton Leontiev bunder@t-25.ru wrote:
В Сбт, 27/03/2010 в 18:39 +0100, Ronald van Haren пишет:
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Anton Leontiev bunder@t-25.ru wrote:
Hello everyone!
I've updated GraphicsMagick PKGBUILD to the version 1.3.12. Can anyone check it and update the package in extra repository?
Please don't. Last time I checked octave didn't build against the new graphicsmagick package. I have to check into that first before updating the package.
Ok. Then can you just add perl bindings to the existing package?
I'll look into it coming week.
Ronald
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org