On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jeremy Audet <ichimonji10@gmail.com> wrote:

Please merge ruby-nanoc [1] into nanoc [2]. Nanoc is primarily intended for use by end users, not as a library. Thus, according to the packaging guidelines, the language-specific prefix should be stripped. I maintain both packages.

— Jeremy "Ichimonji10" Audet

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ruby-nanoc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nanoc/

Merged, thx. -- Maxime