[aur-general] [Rename request] xdtv & xdtv-stable
Hi. Can someone rename my packages [1] & [2] [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1376 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34223 to [1] xdtv-cvs [2] xdtv If not, please delete them and I will reupload them with proper names. Regards, kfgz ---------------------------------------------------------------- Mieszkanie w centrum za 600 zl/m-c http://linkint.pl/f2a7e
On 16/11/11 19:22, Krzysztof Grygiencz wrote:
Hi. Can someone rename my packages [1] & [2]
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1376 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34223
I would suggest to keep the naming as it is currently. 2.4.1cvs15 is a released tarball upstream and the xdtv package uses that, so no need to rename to xdtv-cvs. The -cvs suffix would be used if the source code was checked out of a CVS code repository.
Am Wed, 16 Nov 2011 19:46:31 +0200
schrieb Evangelos Foutras
On 16/11/11 19:22, Krzysztof Grygiencz wrote:
Hi. Can someone rename my packages [1] & [2]
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=1376 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=34223
I would suggest to keep the naming as it is currently. 2.4.1cvs15 is a released tarball upstream and the xdtv package uses that, so no need to rename to xdtv-cvs.
The -cvs suffix would be used if the source code was checked out of a CVS code repository.
I have suggested the renaming in the AUR comments. I think the CVS versions are no real releases. They are just CVS snapshots and therefore unstable versions. And usually stable versions have just the package name while unstable versions have the corresponding extension added. So even if it's just a snapshot and no real cvs build I would suggest renaming the packages to avoid misunderstandings. If the cvs snapshot is indeed stable, at least the -stable package should be renamed to -legacy or something like that. Heiko
participants (3)
-
Evangelos Foutras
-
Heiko Baums
-
Krzysztof Grygiencz