I unsubscribed from the ML so I'm not 100 % sure that this message will nest itself under Xyne's reply[1]. I would appear to be a polarizing force based on the votes; I wouldn't be comfortable joining the TU group given the more or less 50/50 split reflected in the data. To my supporters, I'd like to reiterate a salient point from what I posted yesterday[2]: functionally, nothing will change. I will continue to maintain my repo, I will continue to maintain my PKGBUILDs in the AUR, and people will continue to use my stuff despite Dave's objections. Here are some other data for consideration, as of 24-Mar-2013: *Profile-sync-daemon is installed by just under 5 % of Arch users running pkgstats[3]. *Profile-sync-daemon v5.31-1 has been downloaded by just under 1,400 Debian/Mint/Ubuntu users[4]. *Profile-sync-daemon will, at some point, be included in the Fedora repos[5]. *Profile-sync-daemon has ebuilds maintained by developers for both Gentoo and Exherbo[6]. Thanks again to my supporters. 1. https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-March/022737.html 2. https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-March/022738.html 3. https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics 4. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ppastats ; run the script via `ppastats --release quantal --arch i386 graysky utils` 5. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=912878 6. https://github.com/graysky2/profile-sync-daemon