[aur-general] Duplicated Trash folder in thunderbird
Hi My thunderbird now creates another Trash folder (checked via webmail), and the two trash folders are marked with the trash icon. I can't find a way to go back to a normal situation. Does anybody has the same problem ? I use thunderbird-beta-bin-all-localizations 37. Yamakaky
Hi,
* Yamakaky
My thunderbird now creates another Trash folder (checked via webmail), and the two trash folders are marked with the trash icon. I can't find a way to go back to a normal situation. Does anybody has the same problem ?
I use thunderbird-beta-bin-all-localizations 37.
This seems unrelated to the AUR - did you mean to send this to arch-general rather than aur-general? Florian -- http://www.the-compiler.org | me@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP) GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | http://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc I love long mails! | http://email.is-not-s.ms/
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:31:00 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
This seems unrelated to the AUR - did you mean to send this to arch-general rather than aur-general?
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:40:35 -0400 To: General Discussion about Arch Linux Subject: Re: [arch-general] Duplicated Trash folder in thunderbird [snip] You should post to the aur mailing list since that's an AUR package. [snip]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Am 17.03.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:31:00 +0100, Florian Bruhin wrote:
This seems unrelated to the AUR - did you mean to send this to arch-general rather than aur-general?
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 14:40:35 -0400 To: General Discussion about Arch Linux Subject: Re: [arch-general] Duplicated Trash folder in thunderbird
[snip] You should post to the aur mailing list since that's an AUR package. [snip]
Maybe at this point we should start a discussion for what purpose the several mailing lists are there. IMHO in this case neither arch-general nor aur-general are appropiate, but the comments page in AUR for the requested package is. Citing from https://lists.archlinux.org//listinfo/ arch-general General Discussion about Arch Linux aur-general Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR) If we take it literally, both mailing lists are not appropiate for problems regarding a specific AUR package. And even the existence of the package is dabatable: it is just a perl wrapper script hosted in AUR to let the user _interactively_ (bad!) select the language in which she wants to use thunderbird. It then downloads a binary version of thunderbird and creates a package. Current pkgver is 36.something, not 37 -- maybe for a reason? Ask the maintainer. Just my 0.02 € Best Regards Stefan Husmann -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVCTP9AAoJEIT1NQXkgeRlTacP/0bootdfX3HvAtShgnTXwk2Y 8E6vcghgrOWphhwQzErGhWFyloo1FiusB8i8NgxECfSSv+UwBFOv1DUuMrtXdZFn QutPKsKcxRmL/JLBF07KqDKVtoJ5R0DD9Qwx3bvoW0tg6EeWatm2q6FSdirQWrdm WEu12m32ZJ8EbAIxGHW1lghtBXL9LPJLMwR+6/yyjQ6qnTrpAlZQ25VhZIA7GWVf qW4dyX+9WIksAFZ5sP9T9EH/EUoPXeyDg5U+G+5f09axAsfuqg7jR5IJigG8e8lB shQgtHdbksZ0rUMUc/i811/O1IRso0TxWf7DB43uFeODvDiZhBKnK0acdTQZELND 49zd282H0V87mFTt0a9S+IwlAKpWIVCI/cRE6xbP2kjponKE6KSdf0s578T/EUhy ywQIwIXEysfyoldGWJ06EoYt2DXmU6FX4UeZRHsZnJ+7R9Wr5FVCjBMln+qcbTt7 XdSA/tSll61P9lSGoxpt3cIXnEKeHvEDHK3yZUD5kzPa5uwLVzS5q8VeBWhMOQ9S 8RyBvaHRh4lAxG4dR0JitXHI4SQJa724y4ICb1pieSGsG55Mtri53ahUw6BTXO1z kbIKq77dT1f3uDZdFDoGVEvgkFNFy3qXc52CcPIyj6KYjeuyv/sHngdQO7CKCvm/ 7nf28EBoBMhmhYxQ3qq4 =eWkV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 09:15 +0100, Stefan Husmann wrote:
IMHO in this case neither arch-general nor aur-general are appropiate, but the comments page in AUR for the requested package is.
I also prefer to add a comment, but IMO aur-general is appropiate too. "This list is for [snip] the general public to discuss issues surrounding [snip] the Arch User Repository (AUR)." It doesn't exclude requests about issues, caused by software build from AUR. 2 Cents, Ralf
I finally solved the problem. It's related to [a bug](https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1140831) in the i18n stuff. I fixed it by lanching the english version, fix the bug and restart thunderbird.
And even the existence of the package is dabatable: it is just a perl wrapper script hosted in AUR to let the user _interactively_ (bad!) select the language in which she wants to use thunderbird. It then downloads a binary version of thunderbird and creates a package.
I agree, but maintaining a package per language seems not a good solution to me.
Current pkgver is 36.something, not 37 -- maybe for a reason? Ask the maintainer.
I updated the version manually, as the package has been out of date for a few days.
On 17/03, Yamakaky wrote:
Hi
My thunderbird now creates another Trash folder (checked via webmail), and the two trash folders are marked with the trash icon. I can't find a way to go back to a normal situation. Does anybody has the same problem ?
I use thunderbird-beta-bin-all-localizations 37.
And does the same happen with the repo package? -- Sincerely, Johannes Löthberg PGP Key ID: 0x50FB9B273A9D0BB5 https://theos.kyriasis.com/~kyrias/
participants (5)
-
Florian Bruhin
-
Johannes Löthberg
-
Ralf Mardorf
-
Stefan Husmann
-
Yamakaky