[aur-general] Delete firefox-firebug
Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] and its out-dated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44809
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@gmail.com> wrote:
Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] and its out-dated.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44809
Deleted!
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:25:29 -0600 Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@gmail.com> wrote:
Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] and its out-dated.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44809
Deleted!
Hi, i was the firefox-firebug AUR maintainer. I uploaded this time ago, cause I though firefox-firebug was a better naming, since noscript and adblock-plus extensions in [community] are firefox-noscript and firefox-adblock-plus respectively. firefox-extension-firebug-stable makes no sense to me, since there is no firefox-extension-firebug or any package that would provide a more updated release of the firebug extension. My idea was to replace firefox-extension-firebug-stable with a simpler firefox-firebug. Btw, firefox-firebug was flagged as outdated just about 30 minutes ago, so I actively maintained it. If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable. Otherwise, never mind ;) cheers - speps -
On 16.08.2011 21:54, speps wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:25:29 -0600 Thomas S Hatch <thatch45@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@gmail.com> wrote:
Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] and its out-dated.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44809
Deleted!
I uploaded this time ago, cause I though firefox-firebug was a better naming, since noscript and adblock-plus extensions in [community] are firefox-noscript and firefox-adblock-plus respectively.
You should have requested a remove back then.
My idea was to replace firefox-extension-firebug-stable with a simpler firefox-firebug.
+1 here. If there are multiple versions they should be named like firefox-firebug-beta IMHO.
If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable.
I'd say go with it, but we should probably wait for at least one more opinion on the matter. -- Florian Pritz
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Florian Pritz wrote:
If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable.
I'd say go with it, but we should probably wait for at least one more opinion on the matter.
Sounds good to me; I'm all for naming consistency. Pete.
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 21:37:58 +0100 Peter Lewis <plewis@aur.archlinux.org> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Florian Pritz wrote:
If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable.
I'd say go with it, but we should probably wait for at least one more opinion on the matter.
Sounds good to me; I'm all for naming consistency.
Pete.
Nice, the updated build script is ready to be uploaded. Btw, I prefer to wait at least for Thomas opinion before proceeding. - speps -
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:12:27 +0200 Florian Pritz <bluewind@xinu.at> wrote:
I uploaded this time ago, cause I though firefox-firebug was a better naming, since noscript and adblock-plus extensions in [community] are firefox-noscript and firefox-adblock-plus respectively.
You should have requested a remove back then.
You're right, I totally forgot to send a request. - speps -
participants (5)
-
Florian Pritz
-
Kevin Vesga
-
Peter Lewis
-
speps
-
Thomas S Hatch