On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 13:25:29 -0600 Thomas S Hatch wrote:

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Kevin Vesga <31337h4ck3r@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Please remove firefox-firebug[1] as it a duplicate of firefox-extension-firebug-stable[2] and its out-dated.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=50889 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44809

Deleted!

Hi, i was the firefox-firebug AUR maintainer. I uploaded this time ago, cause I though firefox-firebug was a better naming, since noscript and adblock-plus extensions in [community] are firefox-noscript and firefox-adblock-plus respectively. firefox-extension-firebug-stable makes no sense to me, since there is no firefox-extension-firebug or any package that would provide a more updated release of the firebug extension. My idea was to replace firefox-extension-firebug-stable with a simpler firefox-firebug. Btw, firefox-firebug was flagged as outdated just about 30 minutes ago, so I actively maintained it. If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable. Otherwise, never mind ;) cheers - speps -

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Florian Pritz wrote:

...

If you agree with this, a firefox-firebug could be re-uploaded, replacing the actual firefox-extension-firebug-stable.

I'd say go with it, but we should probably wait for at least one more opinion on the matter.

Sounds good to me; I'm all for naming consistency. Pete.

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:12:27 +0200 Florian Pritz wrote:

...

I uploaded this time ago, cause I though firefox-firebug was a better naming, since noscript and adblock-plus extensions in [community] are firefox-noscript and firefox-adblock-plus respectively.

You should have requested a remove back then.

You're right, I totally forgot to send a request. - speps -