[aur-general] TU Application
Hello all. I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application I'm 21 years old and a Bachelor student Computer Science. I have experience with C++, C, x86 ASM, Java, Python, PHP, SQL and javascript. I use archlinux on daily basis as a server and as desktop on my laptop. Since a year I am a maintainer at the Arch-Games project[0], since then i learned how to deal with makepkg, libpng/libjpeg patches, rebuilding packages for boost/python. Also learning how to work and setup clean chroots for 32 and 64 bit and how to improve PKGBUILDs and use tools like git/svn/namcap. I have had much fun and hard work working on updating packages for arch-games, Daenyth really helped me a lot and #archlinux and #archlinux-offtopic guys too ;) Also I must admit i have learned a lot from Ioni. I would like to become a Trusted User, so I can help packaging for community since something there are a lot of orphan packages so I will be always prepared to update/improve those packages. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz. Also creating more any packages would be better for our mirrors. Since we didn't have much space for packages, I have had to split much data packages to "any". My current packaging interests are haskell, LaTeX, cli apps, virtualization. In the future i am looking into improving tools such as namcap. Feel free ask any questions here or on irc. [0] https://github.com/Arch-Games/arch-games P.S. Allan made me apply :P -- Jelle van der Waa
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 16:50, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Hello all.
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Indeed! Let the discussion period begin, etc. Jelle has been an amazing asset to the Arch-Games project and is the primary reason why we're still running. He's going to be a great asset to the TU team.
Le dimanche 5 décembre 2010 22:50:10, Jelle van der Waa a écrit :
Hello all.
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
I'm 21 years old and a Bachelor student Computer Science. I have experience with C++, C, x86 ASM, Java, Python, PHP, SQL and javascript. I use archlinux on daily basis as a server and as desktop on my laptop.
Since a year I am a maintainer at the Arch-Games project[0], since then i learned how to deal with makepkg, libpng/libjpeg patches, rebuilding packages for boost/python. Also learning how to work and setup clean chroots for 32 and 64 bit and how to improve PKGBUILDs and use tools like git/svn/namcap.
I have had much fun and hard work working on updating packages for arch-games, Daenyth really helped me a lot and #archlinux and #archlinux-offtopic guys too ;) Also I must admit i have learned a lot from Ioni.
I would like to become a Trusted User, so I can help packaging for community since something there are a lot of orphan packages so I will be always prepared to update/improve those packages. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz. Also creating more any packages would be better for our mirrors. Since we didn't have much space for packages, I have had to split much data packages to "any".
My current packaging interests are haskell, LaTeX, cli apps, virtualization.
In the future i am looking into improving tools such as namcap.
Feel free ask any questions here or on irc.
[0] https://github.com/Arch-Games/arch-games
P.S. Allan made me apply :P
Nice application. I think too that more packages can be splitted. ++
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Hello all. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz.
Hi, can I ask what you mean by the splitting of packages? The last thing I want to see is the debianization of our distribution, where one package is needlessly split into a hundred little ones. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 05.12.2010 23:38, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Hello all. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz.
Hi, can I ask what you mean by the splitting of packages? The last thing I want to see is the debianization of our distribution, where one package is needlessly split into a hundred little ones. --Kaiting.
I think he is referring mostly to the game packages. Currently if you want to setup a dedicated game server, you will also have to install the whole graphics dependency stack like mesa on a headless, X-less server. This is obviously undesirable. Splitting would make sense in this case, though so far due to lack of time these packages weren't spit. In detail, it would mean splitting a package like nexuiz into nexuiz-client, nexuiz-server, nexuiz-data, nexuiz-common. I agree that this looks Debian-ish but it might actually make sense. -- Sven-Hendrik
On 12/06/10 at 12:09am, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 05.12.2010 23:38, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Hello all. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz.
Hi, can I ask what you mean by the splitting of packages? The last thing I want to see is the debianization of our distribution, where one package is needlessly split into a hundred little ones. --Kaiting.
I think he is referring mostly to the game packages. Currently if you want to setup a dedicated game server, you will also have to install the whole graphics dependency stack like mesa on a headless, X-less server. This is obviously undesirable.
Splitting would make sense in this case, though so far due to lack of time these packages weren't spit.
In detail, it would mean splitting a package like nexuiz into nexuiz-client, nexuiz-server, nexuiz-data, nexuiz-common. I agree that this looks Debian-ish but it might actually make sense.
-- Sven-Hendrik
Indeed this is partly what i mean with splitting packages. I actually just mean get rid of big packages ( 400Mb ) and turn them into arch=any if you can ( like urbanterror, urbanterro-data) -- Jelle van der Waa
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Indeed this is partly what i mean with splitting packages. I actually just mean get rid of big packages ( 400Mb ) and turn them into arch=any if you can ( like urbanterror, urbanterro-data)
If this is limited to only a couple of packages where the 'any' files are particularly large then I see no problem. Like I said what I'm afraid of is Arch turning into Debian where *every* package has a corresponding *-libs, *-dev, *-bin, etc. and each of the split packages is only a couple hundred kB in size. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 12/05/10 at 05:38pm, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Hello all. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz.
Hi, can I ask what you mean by the splitting of packages? The last thing I want to see is the debianization of our distribution, where one package is needlessly split into a hundred little ones. --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Well for example handbrake could be split to handbrake-gtk, handbrake-qt, etc. And then only if the app supports it with configure flags. And my other argument for more splitting is purely for creating a -data package if the app is big and if the -data pkg has an arch=('any') so you have a smaller repo ;) btw I don't know how crazy debian is with splitting packages ;)
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
On 12/05/10 at 05:38pm, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Hello all. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz.
Hi, can I ask what you mean by the splitting of packages? The last thing I want to see is the debianization of our distribution, where one package is needlessly split into a hundred little ones. --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Well for example handbrake could be split to handbrake-gtk, handbrake-qt, etc. And then only if the app supports it with configure flags. And my other argument for more splitting is purely for creating a -data package if the app is big and if the -data pkg has an arch=('any') so you have a smaller repo ;)
btw I don't know how crazy debian is with splitting packages ;)
I like the idea of splitting packages between server and client if there is a significant difference in dependencies between the server and the client. However I really don't like the idea of splitting out -data packages. This is basically what Debian does. I remember they would take a single package and split it to *-bin, *-libs, *-dev, *-src, *-otherstuff, etc. It's a nightmare. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 12/06/2010 12:22 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
However I really don't like the idea of splitting out -data packages. This is basically what Debian does. I remember they would take a single package and split it to *-bin, *-libs, *-dev, *-src, *-otherstuff, etc. It's a nightmare. --Kaiting.
This actually makes much sense: Imagine a game with 2MB of architecture-dependent executables and 2GB of grafics/sounds. In the repo this will look like this: 2GB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2GB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz total: 4GB When you split out the data part, it looks like this: 2MB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2MB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz 2GB somegame-data-any.pkg.tar.gz total: 2.004GB -- freenode/pyropeter "12:50 - Ich drücke Return."
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, PyroPeter <abi1789@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 12/06/2010 12:22 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
However I really don't like the idea of splitting out -data packages. This is basically what Debian does. I remember they would take a single package and split it to *-bin, *-libs, *-dev, *-src, *-otherstuff, etc. It's a nightmare. --Kaiting.
This actually makes much sense:
Imagine a game with 2MB of architecture-dependent executables and 2GB of grafics/sounds. In the repo this will look like this:
2GB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2GB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz total: 4GB
When you split out the data part, it looks like this:
2MB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2MB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz 2GB somegame-data-any.pkg.tar.gz total: 2.004GB
I know, and in this case it would be fine. Just so long as it doesn't become: 200KB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 200KB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz total: 400KB 180KB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 180KB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz 20KB somegame-data-any.pkg.tar.gz total: 380KB Which is the way Debian would do it. --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 12/05/10 at 07:50pm, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, PyroPeter <abi1789@googlemail.com> wrote:
On 12/06/2010 12:22 AM, Kaiting Chen wrote:
However I really don't like the idea of splitting out -data packages. This is basically what Debian does. I remember they would take a single package and split it to *-bin, *-libs, *-dev, *-src, *-otherstuff, etc. It's a nightmare. --Kaiting.
This actually makes much sense:
Imagine a game with 2MB of architecture-dependent executables and 2GB of grafics/sounds. In the repo this will look like this:
2GB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2GB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz total: 4GB
When you split out the data part, it looks like this:
2MB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 2MB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz 2GB somegame-data-any.pkg.tar.gz total: 2.004GB
I know, and in this case it would be fine. Just so long as it doesn't become:
200KB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 200KB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz total: 400KB
180KB somegame-i686.pkg.tar.gz 180KB somegame-x86_64.pkg.tar.gz 20KB somegame-data-any.pkg.tar.gz total: 380KB
Which is the way Debian would do it. --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Hehehe, well to end this discussion. I want to decrease the server space, so an -data package which is as big as 200Mb would save much space. Although i don't know if that is really a problem with our mirrors? With Arch-Games it was and i thought that it was a nice and efficient way of packaging/managing your repo. -- Jelle van der Waa
Am 06.12.2010 00:13, schrieb Jelle van der Waa:
On 12/05/10 at 05:38pm, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
Hello all. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz.
Hi, can I ask what you mean by the splitting of packages? The last thing I want to see is the debianization of our distribution, where one package is needlessly split into a hundred little ones. --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Well for example handbrake could be split to handbrake-gtk, handbrake-qt, etc. And then only if the app supports it with configure flags. And my other argument for more splitting is purely for creating a -data package if the app is big and if the -data pkg has an arch=('any') so you have a smaller repo ;)
btw I don't know how crazy debian is with splitting packages ;)
Hello, handbrake and handbrake-cli already use the same split PKGBUILD. Same for the svn-counterparts in AUR. If the data files are big and architecture independent, splitting save disk space on the server and probably also bandwidth. So in this case it makes sense. I think, Kaiting was thinking that you wanted to split into a end-user and a devel-package (including header files and libs). I did not understand you that way. Regards Stefan
On 6 December 2010 06:38, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, can I ask what you mean by the splitting of packages? The last thing I want to see is the debianization of our distribution, where one package is needlessly split into a hundred little ones. --Kaiting.
Our splitting is different from Debian's splitting, or any other mainstream distro's splitting. We split when there's benefit for the user, when there are different front-ends to an application, when the docs are huge, when the dogs eat the cats etc. So, don't worry :)
On 12/05/2010 11:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hello all.
Hi,
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
At last you had the balls to apply :P
I'm 21 years old and a Bachelor student Computer Science. I have experience with C++, C, x86 ASM, Java, Python, PHP, SQL and javascript. I use archlinux on daily basis as a server and as desktop on my laptop.
Since a year I am a maintainer at the Arch-Games project[0], since then i learned how to deal with makepkg, libpng/libjpeg patches, rebuilding packages for boost/python. Also learning how to work and setup clean chroots for 32 and 64 bit and how to improve PKGBUILDs and use tools like git/svn/namcap.
I have had much fun and hard work working on updating packages for arch-games, Daenyth really helped me a lot and #archlinux and #archlinux-offtopic guys too ;) Also I must admit i have learned a lot from Ioni.
Indeed and i was having fun spreading the knowledge. I know him from a long time and i enjoy talking and working with him.
I would like to become a Trusted User, so I can help packaging for community since something there are a lot of orphan packages so I will be always prepared to update/improve those packages. I would love to see improvements like more splitting of packages which has been done with packages like compiz. Also creating more any packages would be better for our mirrors. Since we didn't have much space for packages, I have had to split much data packages to "any".
there is a small catch regarding splitting from the same pkgbase. makepkg supports splitting and overriding archs but the scripts that manages our repos doesn't have support and from my understanding, never will do. That means you will need a second pkgbuilds.
My current packaging interests are haskell, LaTeX, cli apps, virtualization.
In the future i am looking into improving tools such as namcap.
Feel free ask any questions here or on irc.
[0] https://github.com/Arch-Games/arch-games
P.S. Allan made me apply :P
i'm the primary witness here. i was present and i can testify -- Ionuț
On 12/06/10 at 10:41am, Allan McRae wrote:
On 06/12/10 09:41, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/05/2010 11:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
P.S. Allan made me apply :P
i'm the primary witness here. i was present and i can testify
Damn right. I think he will be a great addition to the team.
Allan
Thanks allan :D -- Jelle van der Waa
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 22:50 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hello all.
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
I'm 21 years old and a Bachelor student Computer Science. I have experience with C++, C, x86 ASM, Java, Python, PHP, SQL and javascript. I use archlinux on daily basis as a server and as desktop on my laptop.
My current packaging interests are haskell, LaTeX, cli apps, virtualization.
In the future i am looking into improving tools such as namcap.
Feel free ask any questions here or on irc.
Nice. Are there any specific packages that you plan to adopt or add to community? Do you see any relationship between community and arch-games? I know that recently some people have been concerned that disk space on the community server is getting tight, so it might not be a great idea to bring more games. Usually those use a lot of disk.
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist@gmail.com> wrote:
Nice. Are there any specific packages that you plan to adopt or add to community? Do you see any relationship between community and arch-games?
I know that recently some people have been concerned that disk space on the community server is getting tight, so it might not be a great idea to bring more games. Usually those use a lot of disk.
Aren't we getting a new server? --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 12/07/10 at 11:10pm, Loui Chang wrote:
On Sun 05 Dec 2010 22:50 +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hello all.
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
I'm 21 years old and a Bachelor student Computer Science. I have experience with C++, C, x86 ASM, Java, Python, PHP, SQL and javascript. I use archlinux on daily basis as a server and as desktop on my laptop.
My current packaging interests are haskell, LaTeX, cli apps, virtualization.
In the future i am looking into improving tools such as namcap.
Feel free ask any questions here or on irc.
Nice. Are there any specific packages that you plan to adopt or add to community? Do you see any relationship between community and arch-games?
I know that recently some people have been concerned that disk space on the community server is getting tight, so it might not be a great idea to bring more games. Usually those use a lot of disk.
Well let me see what packages i want to adopt, i haven't planned to add packages to [community]. I don't plan to add packages from arch-games to [community] neither do i see any relation between those projects. Except that both are archlinux repo's ;)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I don't plan to add packages from arch-games to [community] neither do i see any relation between those projects. Except that both are archlinux repo's ;)
Is there a particular reason you don't see the more popular packages in arch-games entering [community]? --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
Hehehe, i have seen the movement of popular packages to [community] (SVEN STOLE OUR PACKAGES!!!). But i didn't really care that much about it. I mean anyone can put in community what they like ( as TU ) ;) -- Jelle van der Waa On 12/09/10 at 12:52am, Kaiting Chen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I don't plan to add packages from arch-games to [community] neither do i see any relation between those projects. Except that both are archlinux repo's ;)
Is there a particular reason you don't see the more popular packages in arch-games entering [community]? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On 09.12.2010 15:18, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hehehe, i have seen the movement of popular packages to [community] (SVEN STOLE OUR PACKAGES!!!). But i didn't really care that much about it. I mean anyone can put in community what they like ( as TU ) ;)
SVEN WHO? Nevertheless, I think popular games benefit everyone more when they are in [community]. -- Not Sven
Probably true, cause everyone has [community] as default in pacman.conf :P offtopic: sven who?! sven the wizard! -- Jelle van der Waa On 12/09/10 at 05:01pm, Sven-Hendrik Haase wrote:
On 09.12.2010 15:18, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Hehehe, i have seen the movement of popular packages to [community] (SVEN STOLE OUR PACKAGES!!!). But i didn't really care that much about it. I mean anyone can put in community what they like ( as TU ) ;)
SVEN WHO?
Nevertheless, I think popular games benefit everyone more when they are in [community].
-- Not Sven
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting. -- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start. Ronald
Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen <kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa <jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start.
Ronald
proposal activated.
On 12/13/2010 01:29 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen<kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start.
Ronald
proposal activated.
the results are: yes 22 no 0 abstain 3 Welcome in the team dude. Here is what you have to do: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_f... -- Ionuț
On Dec 20, 2010, at 10:31 AM, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:29 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen<kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start.
Ronald
proposal activated.
the results are: yes 22 no 0 abstain 3
Welcome in the team dude. Here is what you have to do:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_f...
-- Ionuț
Congratulations an welcome! Regards, Brad
Thanks all, let's start reading ;) -- Jelle van der Waa On 12/20/10 at 06:31pm, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:29 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen<kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start.
Ronald
proposal activated.
the results are: yes 22 no 0 abstain 3
Welcome in the team dude. Here is what you have to do:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_f...
-- Ionuț
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:42:15PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Thanks all, let's start reading ;)
-- Jelle van der Waa
On 12/20/10 at 06:31pm, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:29 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen<kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start.
Ronald
proposal activated.
the results are: yes 22 no 0 abstain 3
Welcome in the team dude. Here is what you have to do:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_f...
-- Ionuț
I'm changing my vote. Had I know he was a top poster... Ah well, guess we're stuck now. Welcome! ;P dave
Dave Reisner wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:42:15PM +0100, Jelle van der Waa wrote:
Thanks all, let's start reading ;)
-- Jelle van der Waa
On 12/20/10 at 06:31pm, Ionuț Bîru wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:29 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen<kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
> I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for > my TU application >
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start.
Ronald
proposal activated.
the results are: yes 22 no 0 abstain 3
Welcome in the team dude. Here is what you have to do:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_f...
-- Ionuț
I'm changing my vote. Had I know he was a top poster...
Ah well, guess we're stuck now. Welcome! ;P
dave
*takes out the beating stick again*
Le lundi 20 décembre 2010 17:42:15, Jelle van der Waa a écrit :
Thanks all, let's start reading ;)
the results are: yes 22 no 0 abstain 3
Welcome in the team dude. Here is what you have to do:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_lis t_for_new_Trusted_Users
Welcome Jelle! ++
On 20 December 2010 17:31, Ionuț Bîru <ibiru@archlinux.org> wrote:
On 12/13/2010 01:29 PM, Stefan Husmann wrote:
Am 13.12.2010 11:03, schrieb Ronald van Haren:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Kaiting Chen<kaitocracy@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Jelle van der Waa<jelle@vdwaa.nl> wrote:
I would like apply to become a TU! Daenyth has decided to sponsor me for my TU application
Voting period starts today right? --Kaiting.
-- Kiwis and Limes: http://kaitocracy.blogspot.com/
It has been eight days since he applied, so yes it should start.
Ronald
proposal activated.
the results are: yes 22 no 0 abstain 3
Welcome in the team dude. Here is what you have to do:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR_Trusted_User_Guidelines#TODO_list_f...
-- Ionuț
Congratulations!
participants (16)
-
Allan McRae
-
Brad Fanella
-
Daenyth Blank
-
Dave Reisner
-
Ionuț Bîru
-
Jelle van der Waa
-
Kaiting Chen
-
Laurent Carlier
-
Loui Chang
-
Lukáš Jirkovský
-
PyroPeter
-
Ray Rashif
-
Ronald van Haren
-
Stefan Husmann
-
Sven-Hendrik Haase
-
Xyne