On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Xavier <shiningxc@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Vojtech Horky <vojta.horky@seznam.cz> wrote:

...

Hi, I found that there are two packages providing the same program(s): * gcu (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21896) * gnome-chemistry-utils (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24793)

Could one of the TUs, please, delete one of them (IMHO gcu is packaged better)?

Thanks - Vojta

The tarball name is gnome-chemistry-utils-0.10.8.tar.bz2 Isn't it common usage to use that name ?

Yeah, I like to use longer name too, because other package can occur with this abbreviation too, and they will conflict. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp

...

Hi, I found that there are two packages providing the same program(s): * gcu (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21896) * gnome-chemistry-utils (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24793)

Could one of the TUs, please, delete one of them (IMHO gcu is packaged better)?

Thanks - Vojta

Hello, I removed gnome-chemistry-utils, thank you for the hint.

Regards Stefan

Thanks. Would it be possible to rename the gcu (I agree with Xavier that the longer name is better) or shall I rather contact the maintainer with request for re-submitting under the long name? - Vojta

2009/10/4 Stefan Husmann <stefan-husmann@t-online.de>:

Vojtech Horky schrieb:

...

...

...

Hi, I found that there are two packages providing the same program(s): * gcu (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21896) * gnome-chemistry-utils (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24793)

Could one of the TUs, please, delete one of them (IMHO gcu is packaged better)?

Thanks - Vojta

Hello, I removed gnome-chemistry-utils, thank you for the hint.

Regards Stefan

Thanks. Would it be possible to rename the gcu (I agree with Xavier that the longer name is better) or shall I rather contact the maintainer with request for re-submitting under the long name? - Vojta

Hello,

renaming is not possible, so you can try to convince the maintainer to upload his package under the longer name. If he does so, he should also write to this list so that we can delete the gcu package. The Disadvantage Packages were re-uploaded. Could you, please, delete the original ones (http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=21896, http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=30083)? would be that he will loose his votes. There is no way to transfer them?

Regards Stefan

Regards - Vojta