[aur-general] Orphan deletion requests - (nano-all-svn) and (nano-svn)
Please can these two out-of-date, not-updated, orphaned AUR packages be deleted? https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-all-svn/ I have just uploaded a replacement up-to-date package that replaces the need for those two: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-latest/
I have just uploaded a replacement up-to-date package that replaces the need for those two:
The project refers to nano 2.3.x branch as "devel", so nano-devel or nano-unstable would be the right package name I believe. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
I'd considered that, but it's still been "stable" (i.e. not
superseded) for over a year now, and there are 2.3.3 release
candidates referred to as devel/unstable
On 26 May 2014 15:34, Nowaker
I have just uploaded a replacement up-to-date package that replaces the need for those two:
The project refers to nano 2.3.x branch as "devel", so nano-devel or nano-unstable would be the right package name I believe.
-- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
On Mon, 26 May 2014 14:10:00 +0100
Steven Honeyman
Please can these two out-of-date, not-updated, orphaned AUR packages be deleted?
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-all-svn/
I have just uploaded a replacement up-to-date package that replaces the need for those two:
Hi Steven, I'll leave nano-svn untouched as someone may want to adopt it sooner or later. nano-all-svn is gone now. I'm not really convinced to your naming scheme. -devel or -unstable suffix would be much more appropriate. Can you please re-upload your package under one of these names? -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
On Mon, 26 May 2014 14:10:00 +0100
Steven Honeyman
Please can these two out-of-date, not-updated, orphaned AUR packages be deleted?
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-all-svn/
I have just uploaded a replacement up-to-date package that replaces the need for those two:
Hi Steven, I'll leave nano-svn untouched as someone may want to adopt it sooner or later. nano-all-svn is gone now. I'm not really convinced to your naming scheme. -devel or -unstable suffix would be much more appropriate. Can you please re-upload your package under one of these names? -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
On Mon, 26 May 2014 14:10:00 +0100
Steven Honeyman
Please can these two out-of-date, not-updated, orphaned AUR packages be deleted?
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-svn/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nano-all-svn/
I have just uploaded a replacement up-to-date package that replaces the need for those two:
Hi Steven, I'll leave nano-svn untouched as someone may want to adopt it sooner or later. nano-all-svn is gone now. I'm not really convinced to your naming scheme. -devel or -unstable suffix would be much more appropriate. Can you please re-upload your package under one of these names? -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/
participants (3)
-
Bartłomiej Piotrowski
-
Nowaker
-
Steven Honeyman