Should the following packages have a name changing to make it more standard?

[firefox32][1] --> bin32-firefox [firefox32-i18n][2] --> bin32-firefox-i18n

Or else,is there a bin32 or lib32 naming standard recommended,I didn't not find anything mentioned this in Arch Wiki Page.

[1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18644 [2]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=18647