[aur-general] Intellij IDEA Ultimate's
I personally prefer the flag thing [...] The "-meta" thing is a little... [...] The cleanest solution may very well be what we have now.
Agree, the thing with the meta packages is a bit overcomplicated. How about a single PKGFILE, which creates two packages with the "split package" mechanism (one with, one without JRE). @uwolfer wdyt? I can prepare the code.
Reto Kaiser reto at retokaiser.com (Sun Feb 5 12:17:00 UTC 2017)
Det nimetonmaili at gmail.com (Sat Feb 4 15:57:20 UTC 2017)
I personally prefer the flag thing [...] The "-meta" thing is a little... [...] The cleanest solution may very well be what we have now.
Agree, the thing with the meta packages is a bit overcomplicated. How about a single PKGFILE, which creates two packages with the "split package" mechanism (one with, one without JRE). @uwolfer wdyt? I can prepare the code.
All suggestions so far have been about a single PKGBUILD, so I'm assuming you mean a single source (the larger one), and then removing the jre/ folder from the other. That kind of takes the advantage away of the smaller download (503M vs. 572M), and will always create a conflict after build. Det
On 02/05/2017 07:17 AM, Reto Kaiser wrote:
I personally prefer the flag thing [...] The "-meta" thing is a little... [...] The cleanest solution may very well be what we have now.
Agree, the thing with the meta packages is a bit overcomplicated. How about a single PKGFILE, which creates two packages with the "split package" mechanism (one with, one without JRE). @uwolfer wdyt? I can prepare the code.
Perhaps you could create two split packages, one for intellij-idea-utimate-edition, one for the bundled JRE... and have the former optdepend on the latter and on the system JRE. The four-way split, meta-package dependency is over-engineered, but without the repo package providing ${pkgbase}-jre I don't see how to do it via a clean dependency *at all*... since Arch Linux users are always expected to pay attention to pacman's output e.g. optdepends, this shouldn't pose a problem to users. It wouldn't be the first package to *need* at-least-one-of its optdepends to be installed. -- Eli Schwartz
Yes I would also totally agree with the split package approach for an optional jre. And FYI, you can find CLion a perfect example for implementing this: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=clion . Eli Schwartz via aur-general <aur-general@archlinux.org>于2017年2月6日周一 上午1:59写道：
On 02/05/2017 07:17 AM, Reto Kaiser wrote:
I personally prefer the flag thing [...] The "-meta" thing is a little... [...] The cleanest solution may very well be what we have now.
Agree, the thing with the meta packages is a bit overcomplicated. How about a single PKGFILE, which creates two packages with the "split package" mechanism (one with, one without JRE). @uwolfer wdyt? I can prepare the code.
Perhaps you could create two split packages, one for intellij-idea-utimate-edition, one for the bundled JRE... and have the former optdepend on the latter and on the system JRE.
The four-way split, meta-package dependency is over-engineered, but without the repo package providing ${pkgbase}-jre I don't see how to do it via a clean dependency *at all*... since Arch Linux users are always expected to pay attention to pacman's output e.g. optdepends, this shouldn't pose a problem to users.
It wouldn't be the first package to *need* at-least-one-of its optdepends to be installed.
-- Eli Schwartz
-- 张海 浙江大学 计算机科学与技术 Blog: http://blog.zhanghai.me/ Github: https://github.com/DreaminginCodeZH
participants (4)
-
Det
-
Eli Schwartz
-
Reto Kaiser
-
张海