[aur-general] Package in AUR with same name of one in extra
Hi, Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version 2.0.0). If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful. Regards Renato Garcia
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version 2.0.0).
If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful.
Regards
Renato Garcia
Renaming can't be solved, just deleting. Be patient, it will be updated soon :) Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version 2.0.0).
If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful.
Regards
Renato Garcia
Deleted. -- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Arch Linux Trusted User Linux Counter: #359909 http://www.angvp.com
What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages? I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD. On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:24:43 +0100 Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version 2.0.0).
If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful.
Regards
Renato Garcia
Renaming can't be solved, just deleting. Be patient, it will be updated soon :)
Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages?
I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD.
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:24:43 +0100 Laszlo Papp <djszapi@archlinux.us> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version 2.0.0).
If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful.
Regards
Renato Garcia
Renaming can't be solved, just deleting. Be patient, it will be updated soon :)
Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
See a new ticket on http://bugs.archlinux.org, and attach the updated PKGBUIILD, or if there is svn/git/cvs/etc. version controlled part of it, upload it to AUR as opencv-git/svn/cvs/etc. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
Laszlo Papp wrote:
See a new ticket on http://bugs.archlinux.org, and attach the updated PKGBUIILD, or if there is svn/git/cvs/etc. version controlled part of it, upload it to AUR as opencv-git/svn/cvs/etc.
Wow... such bad advice. This is stated at the top of the bug tracker: Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List. REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages! Allan
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org> wrote:
Laszlo Papp wrote:
See a new ticket on http://bugs.archlinux.org, and attach the updated PKGBUIILD, or if there is svn/git/cvs/etc. version controlled part of it, upload it to AUR as opencv-git/svn/cvs/etc.
Wow... such bad advice. This is stated at the top of the bug tracker:
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List.
REPEAT: Do NOT report bugs for outdated packages!
Allan
Huh, sorry, indeed. Then maybe it's better to follow Eric's instruction. Best Regards, Laszlo Papp
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 1:05 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato@gmail.com> wrote:
What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages?
I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD.
Post the updated PKGBUILD here. I'll update the package in extra. I assume that you use this stuff and that the new version works fine, right?.
participants (5)
-
Allan McRae
-
Angel Velásquez
-
Eric Bélanger
-
Laszlo Papp
-
Renato Garcia