Hi! With the support for base packages and the .AURINFO, I need someone who do a review on my package (roccat-tools). Is this the way it is intended? Please let me know if I miss(understand) something or other things I can optimize. Thanks! Aaron
On 8 June 2014 21:55, Aaron Mueller <mail@aaron-mueller.de> wrote:
Hi!
With the support for base packages and the .AURINFO, I need someone who do a review on my package (roccat-tools). Is this the way it is intended? Please let me know if I miss(understand) something or other things I can optimize.
Thanks! Aaron Hi,
The AUR now has proper support for split packages, so the old "true &&" hack is no longer needed. The "roccat-tools" package looks like it'd be empty, in which case you can drop that (just rename your initial "pkgver=roccat-tools" to "pkgbase=roccat-tools"). Other than that, I think your PKGBUILD is fine. Cheers, WorMzy
participants (2)
-
Aaron Mueller
-
WorMzy Tykashi