I guess then I'll have to wait until you rename the package in order to upload the renamed and rebuild source tarball. Right? 2013/3/9 Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira

Ah! Yes I intend to rename it. I just thought you had to delete the old one and create a new one with the new name. In this case its name would be rosa-media-player-develop-git.

2013/3/9 Federico Cinelli

...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 01:46:11 +0000, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira wrote:

...

Greetings! I hereby request that the rosa-media-player-git [1] package be deleted, since I intend to replace it by a similar package derived from the develop branch of the rosa-media-player upstream git repo. This one seems to contain a true bleeding edge version of this application, while the master branch (the one reflected in [1]) only contains a minor changes compared to the latest stable version.

Signed, Dominor.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rosa-media-player-git/

Once you've built the new package just up update this one. Or if you plan on renaming it, let me know.

-- Federico Cinelli Arch Linux Trusted User (cinelli) GnuPG Key: 0xC6C11350 "Stay true."

Ok. That's alright by me. 2013/3/9 Federico Cinelli

...

I guess then I'll have to wait until you rename the package in order to upload the renamed and rebuild source tarball. Right?

2013/3/9 Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira

...

Ah! Yes I intend to rename it. I just thought you had to delete the old one and create a new one with the new name. In this case its name would be rosa-media-player-develop-git.

2013/3/9 Federico Cinelli

...

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 01:46:11 +0000, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira wrote:

...

Greetings! I hereby request that the rosa-media-player-git [1] package be deleted, since I intend to replace it by a similar package derived from the develop branch of the rosa-media-player upstream git repo. This one seems to contain a true bleeding edge version of this application, while the master branch (the one reflected in [1]) only contains a minor changes compared to the latest stable version.

Signed, Dominor.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rosa-media-player-git/

Once you've built the new package just up update this one. Or if you

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 02:22:20 +0000, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira wrote: plan

...

...

...

on renaming it, let me know.

-- Federico Cinelli Arch Linux Trusted User (cinelli) GnuPG Key: 0xC6C11350 "Stay true."

Or you could keep both the git and devel version active on the aur. Since I'd imagine that one would be more "stable" than the other?

-- Federico Cinelli Arch Linux Trusted User (cinelli) GnuPG Key: 0xC6C11350 "Stay true."

Federico Cinelli wrote:

On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 01:46:11 +0000, Vítor Miguel Miranda Ferreira wrote:

...

Greetings! I hereby request that the rosa-media-player-git [1] package be deleted, since I intend to replace it by a similar package derived from the develop branch of the rosa-media-player upstream git repo. This one seems to contain a true bleeding edge version of this application, while the master branch (the one reflected in [1]) only contains a minor changes compared to the latest stable version.

Signed, Dominor.

[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rosa-media-player-git/

Once you've built the new package just up update this one. Or if you plan on renaming it, let me know.

foo-git packages should track the upstream master branch. If you want to follow another branch (e.g. devel), use a different name (e.g. foo-devel-git). There is no apparent reason to merge/delete the current package.