Hello.
Please merge the 'maxreloaded' package [1] into 'maxr' [2]. They are both for the M.A.X. Reloaded game, but: [1] is outdated (latest version has been released in December); [2] has a better name, so I adopted and updated it recently.
I e-mailed the maintainer of [1] a week ago, but he didn't respond.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23046 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24250
Also there are two packages for the ASCII Invaders game: ascii-invaders [3] - orphan and doesn't work; and asciiinvaders [4], which is maintained.
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54804
On Sat, 26 May 2012 18:21:13 +0600 Anton Bazhenov anton.bazhenov@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Please merge the 'maxreloaded' package [1] into 'maxr' [2]. They are both for the M.A.X. Reloaded game, but: [1] is outdated (latest version has been released in December); [2] has a better name, so I adopted and updated it recently.
I e-mailed the maintainer of [1] a week ago, but he didn't respond.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23046 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24250
Done, thanks.
Also there are two packages for the ASCII Invaders game: ascii-invaders [3] - orphan and doesn't work; and asciiinvaders [4], which is maintained.
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54804
ascii-invaders is probably a better naming (what upstream suggested).
Would you mind adopting and updating ascii-invaders, so an inverse merging could be done instead? (asciiinvaders -> ascii-invaders)
Differently, please contact the actual asciiinvaders maintainer and ask him to adopt and update ascii-invaders.
-- Best Regards,
Anton Bazhenov
- speps -
2012/5/26 speps speps@gmx.com
On Sat, 26 May 2012 18:21:13 +0600 Anton Bazhenov anton.bazhenov@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Please merge the 'maxreloaded' package [1] into 'maxr' [2]. They are both for the M.A.X. Reloaded game, but: [1] is outdated (latest version has been released in December); [2] has a better name, so I adopted and updated it recently.
I e-mailed the maintainer of [1] a week ago, but he didn't respond.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23046 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24250
Done, thanks.
Also there are two packages for the ASCII Invaders game: ascii-invaders [3] - orphan and doesn't work; and asciiinvaders [4], which is maintained.
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54804
ascii-invaders is probably a better naming (what upstream suggested).
Would you mind adopting and updating ascii-invaders, so an inverse merging could be done instead? (asciiinvaders -> ascii-invaders)
Differently, please contact the actual asciiinvaders maintainer and ask him to adopt and update ascii-invaders.
-- Best Regards,
Anton Bazhenov
- speps -
I have already contacted the 'asciiinvaders' maintainer, but he ignored my suggestion. And he is active, so I don't see any reason to adopt the 'ascii-invaders' package.
On 26 May 2012 15:01, Anton Bazhenov anton.bazhenov@gmail.com wrote:
2012/5/26 speps speps@gmx.com
On Sat, 26 May 2012 18:21:13 +0600 Anton Bazhenov anton.bazhenov@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
Please merge the 'maxreloaded' package [1] into 'maxr' [2]. They are both for the M.A.X. Reloaded game, but: [1] is outdated (latest version has been released in December); [2] has a better name, so I adopted and updated it recently.
I e-mailed the maintainer of [1] a week ago, but he didn't respond.
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=23046 [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=24250
Done, thanks.
Also there are two packages for the ASCII Invaders game: ascii-invaders [3] - orphan and doesn't work; and asciiinvaders [4], which is maintained.
[3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=11141 [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=54804
ascii-invaders is probably a better naming (what upstream suggested).
Would you mind adopting and updating ascii-invaders, so an inverse merging could be done instead? (asciiinvaders -> ascii-invaders)
Differently, please contact the actual asciiinvaders maintainer and ask him to adopt and update ascii-invaders.
-- Best Regards,
Anton Bazhenov
- speps -
I have already contacted the 'asciiinvaders' maintainer, but he ignored my suggestion. And he is active, so I don't see any reason to adopt the 'ascii-invaders' package.
-- Best Regards,
Anton Bazhenov
I merged asciiinvaders into ascii-invaders. The asciiinvaders maintainer didn't respond at all. Also it was a newer dupplicate (asciiinvaders is from 2011 and ascii-invaders is from 2007).
BTW: Someone already took over ascii-invaders.
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org