[aur-general] Packages for deletion?
Mediatomb 0.12.1-2 appears to be in community already, so does that mean the AUR version is superfluous? http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/mediatomb/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mediatomb/ Gordon MM0YEQ
On 19 October 2010 03:48, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@gjcp.net> wrote:
Mediatomb 0.12.1-2 appears to be in community already, so does that mean the AUR version is superfluous?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/mediatomb/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mediatomb/
All I see in AUR is mediatomb-svn, and that's fine. Someone probably just deleted mediatomb if it did exist.
On 19/10/10 08:53, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 19 October 2010 03:48, Gordon JC Pearce<gordonjcp@gjcp.net> wrote:
Mediatomb 0.12.1-2 appears to be in community already, so does that mean the AUR version is superfluous?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/mediatomb/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mediatomb/
All I see in AUR is mediatomb-svn, and that's fine. Someone probably just deleted mediatomb if it did exist.
I was gonna say... was sure I'd deleted it months ago :P
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 03:53 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:
On 19 October 2010 03:48, Gordon JC Pearce <gordonjcp@gjcp.net> wrote:
Mediatomb 0.12.1-2 appears to be in community already, so does that mean the AUR version is superfluous?
http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/i686/mediatomb/ http://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/mediatomb/
All I see in AUR is mediatomb-svn, and that's fine. Someone probably just deleted mediatomb if it did exist.
Disregard, I soak cakes. I appear to have been searching the wrong thing. Gordon MM0YEQ
participants (3)
-
Gordon JC Pearce
-
Jonathan Conder
-
Ray Rashif