[aur-general] Merge requests
Hello, some other VCS-dupes (CC'ing some maintainers): claws-contacts (VCS) * claws-contacts-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-contacts-git/ * claws-contacts-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-contacts-cvs/ claws-mail (VCS) * claws-mail-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-cvs/ * claws-mail-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/claws-mail-git/ The git versions were uploaded only some days ago, and the maintainer left a comment on their cvs counterpart's AUR pages, so they should stay a resasonable amount of time, say two weeks. efbb (VCS) * efbb-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efbb-git/ * efbb-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/efbb-svn/ The git version was uploaded only some days ago, and the maintainer left a comment on its svn counterpart's AUR pages, so it should stay a resasonable amount of time, say two weeks. ardour3-vst (VCS) * ardour3-vst-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ardour3-vst-svn/ * ardour3-vst-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ardour3-vst-git/ joliebulle (VCS) * joliebulle-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/joliebulle-git/ * joliebulle-bzr https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/joliebulle-bzr/ The git version was uploaded only some days ago, and the maintainer left a comment on its svn counterpart's AUR pages, so it should stay a resasonable amount of time, say two weeks. libticables (VCS) * libticables-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticables-git/ * libticables-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticables-svn/ Repo exists, but sorceforge only mentions git repo. Orphaned. libticonv (VCS) * libticonv-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticonv-git/ * libticonv-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticonv-svn/ Repo exists, but sorceforge only mentions git repo. Orphaned. libtifiles (VCS) * libtifiles-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libtifiles-svn/ * libtifiles-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libtifiles-git/ Repo exists, but sorceforge only mentions git repo. Orphaned. libticalcs (VCS) * libticalcs-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticalcs-git/ * libticalcs-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libticalcs-svn/ Similar to libticables, but maintained. CC'ing maintainers. llqtwebkit (VCS) * llqtwebkit-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llqtwebkit-git/ * llqtwebkit-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/llqtwebkit-hg/ both repos exist, but mercurial is official. lua-lm (VCS) * lua-lm-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-lm-git/ * lua-lm-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-lm-hg/ both repos exist, but mercurial is official. luma (VCS) * luma-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luma-git/ * luma-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luma-cvs/ Homepage only mentiones svn-repo. No git, no CVS. Weird. lwjgl (VCS) * lwjgl-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwjgl-svn/ very old, project moved to github. * lwjgl-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwjgl-git/ mangler (VCS) * mangler-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mangler-svn/ official version * mangler-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mangler-git/ github version Both seem up to date, maybe keep both. mikutter (VCS) * mikutter-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mikutter-git/ * mikutter-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mikutter-svn/ Both seem up to date, maybe keep both. Homepage is in japanese, I think. opencv (VCS) * opencv-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencv-git/ * opencv-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opencv-svn/ obsolete since July, see AUR comments. opensc (VCS) * opensc-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensc-git/ * opensc-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensc-svn/ obsolete since July, see AUR comments. opensg (VCS) * opensg-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensg-git/ official development of version 2 * opensg-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensg-cvs/ legacy version 1, built using a tarball, not CVS. Suggestion: keep both, but rename the latter. php-gtk (VCS) * php-gtk-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk-git/ * php-gtk-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/php-gtk-svn/ moved to git, see comments pilas (VCS) * pilas-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pilas-hg/ * pilas-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pilas-git/ The git version was uploaded only some weeks ago, and the maintainer left a comment on its hg counterpart's AUR pages, so it should stay a resasonable amount of time. Best Regards
Stefan Husmann wrote:
lua-lm (VCS) * lua-lm-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-lm-git/ * lua-lm-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lua-lm-hg/ both repos exist, but mercurial is official.
kept
luma (VCS) * luma-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luma-git/ * luma-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/luma-cvs/ Homepage only mentiones svn-repo. No git, no CVS. Weird.
eworm seems to be a good packager so I'm assuming he knows what he is doing with these.
mangler (VCS) * mangler-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mangler-svn/ official version * mangler-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mangler-git/ github version Both seem up to date, maybe keep both.
kept
mikutter (VCS) * mikutter-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mikutter-git/ * mikutter-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mikutter-svn/ Both seem up to date, maybe keep both. Homepage is in japanese, I think.
kept until someone who understands the webpage can determine if svn is deprecated
opensg (VCS) * opensg-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensg-git/ official development of version 2 * opensg-cvs https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/opensg-cvs/ legacy version 1, built using a tarball, not CVS. Suggestion: keep both, but rename the latter.
Please send an email to the maintainer asking him to re-upload the package as opensg, then send another email to this list when he does. I have merged everything else. Interested users should have received the comments and thus know to switch to the new CVS versions. Thanks! (for the info and for helping me meet my TU quota)
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Xyne <xyne@archlinux.ca> wrote:
Stefan Husmann wrote:
mikutter (VCS) * mikutter-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mikutter-git/ * mikutter-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mikutter-svn/ Both seem up to date, maybe keep both. Homepage is in japanese, I think.
kept until someone who understands the webpage can determine if svn is deprecated
The webpage is not clear, actualy: ----------------------------------------------------------------- mikutterは現在も開発中です。週に2,3回くらいのペースでコミットされています。以下のリポジトリをチェックアウトしてください。 git://toshia.dip.jp/mikutter.git svn://toshia.dip.jp/mikutter/trunk ----------------------------------------------------------------- First line is: "mikutter is currently under development. There are about 2 or 3 commits per week. Please checkout the repositorie(s) below." Japanese doesn't have plurals, hence the "(s)". Someone will have to contact the devs to find out which repo is official.
participants (3)
-
Stefan Husmann
-
Vitor Eiji Justus Sakaguti
-
Xyne