[aur-general] Haddock
I am the maintainer of the haddock package on aur. I was planning to update it in some time... by then I got a message from arch-haskell requesting a change in maintainership. Should I orphan it so that you can take over it?
If you can't maintain/update it you should drop it, to other
maintainer that want to maintain/update it for you.
arch-haskell maintain many haskell package, sure you can trust in drop it.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Ashok Gautham
I am the maintainer of the haddock package on aur. I was planning to update it in some time... by then I got a message from arch-haskell requesting a change in maintainership. Should I orphan it so that you can take over it?
-- Angel Velásquez angvp @ irc.freenode.net Linux Counter: #359909 Arch Linux Trusted User
2008/7/27 Ashok Gautham
I am the maintainer of the haddock package on aur. I was planning to update it in some time... by then I got a message from arch-haskell requesting a change in maintainership. Should I orphan it so that you can take over it?
You can't be obligate by anyone. Try to keep your package in-date, and don't worry if a TU want it: he has the right permission to take the ownership (maybe with a 'thanks for your work' in the comment field ).
scriptdevil:
I am the maintainer of the haddock package on aur. I was planning to update it in some time... by then I got a message from arch-haskell requesting a change in maintainership. Should I orphan it so that you can take over it?
That would be one good approach. You can orphan it, have arch-haskell pick it up, and help with the arch-haskell packages in general, if you wish. Drop by #arch-haskell on freenode and we can work something out. -- Don
participants (4)
-
Angel Velásquez
-
Ashok Gautham
-
DaNiMoTh
-
Don Stewart