works for me. On 11/27/07, Aaron Griffin wrote:

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

received -Marco Aaron Griffin wrote:

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:53:06 -0600 "Aaron Griffin" wrote:

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

received..... Daniel

received 2007/11/27, Daniel Isenmann :

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:53:06 -0600 "Aaron Griffin" wrote:

...

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

received.....

Daniel

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

-- Artyom

its working here. :) -- []'s Hugo Doria http://hdoria.archlinux-br.org GNU/Linux user #359340 - http://counter.li.org

On Nov 27, 2007 2:09 PM, Pierre Schmitz wrote:

Am Dienstag, 27. November 2007 20:53:06 schrieb Aaron Griffin:

...

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Hey, I have to rewrite my maildrop rules...

Yeah, gmail filters needed updating here 8)

On 11/27/07, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:

I guess the aur-dev ML wasnt ment to be private. Already subscribed :-)

Greg

No. It was not meant to be private. It is the mailing list where discussion about the aur website code and backend utility scripts should be taking place, as well as talk about any aur2 work (planned or otherwise). :)

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:36:16PM -0800, eliott wrote:

On 11/27/07, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote:

...

I guess the aur-dev ML wasnt ment to be private. Already subscribed :-)

Greg

No. It was not meant to be private. It is the mailing list where discussion about the aur website code and backend utility scripts should be taking place, as well as talk about any aur2 work (planned or otherwise).

:)

I guess it will reduce the load from the arch-projects one :P Greg

2007/11/27, Aaron Griffin :

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Received. -- Giovanni Scafora Arch Linux Trusted User (voidnull) http://www.archlinux.org linuxmania@gmail.com

2007/11/27, Aaron Griffin :

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

:) -- Linux User #382319 http://blog.zerial.org

Aye, works fine. (btw, should replies to above or below message?) 2007/11/27, Simon Streit :

...

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

It works.

Regards

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

Hi all, ACK :) Regards João Rodrigues Ter, 2007-11-27 às 13:53 -0600, Aaron Griffin escreveu:

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 13:53:06 -0600, Aaron Griffin wrote:

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

Aye Aye Captain.

LOL Travis Willard wrote:

On Nov 27, 2007 4:43 PM, Mathias Burén wrote:

...

Aye, works fine. (btw, should replies to above or below message?)

Generally, all mailing-list replies should go below their contextual quotes. Since I'm sure someone will quote it here, I may as well:

A: Because it breaks the user's natural reading order. Q: Why is top-posting bad?

Or some derivative thereof.

Seriously though, I think replies below other messages only makes sense if either that message was very short, or you're replying to specific paragraphs, in which case you write your stuff beneath each such paragraph. If you're replying to a long messages with another one without specifically addressing certain paragraphs, then the previous message is simply included for reference and it becomes plain annoying when this message is put on top. In my humble opinion, of course. Regards, Bjørn (and this messages also completes my part of the aur-general functional list rename test...)

Aaron Griffin wrote:

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

Yes it works :)

On 28/11/2007, Shinlun Hsieh wrote:

...

Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

Yes it works :)

Well, I think that's enough confirmation. :P

On Nov 28, 2007 1:41 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:

On Nov 28, 2007 12:34 PM, Travis Willard wrote:

...

Well, I think that's enough confirmation. :P

You sure? I dunno, I think we need maybe like 10 or 20 more still just to be sure!

If I confirm that I received 20 confirmations already, does that work? Can we do exponential confirmation?

2007/11/28, Travis Willard :

On Nov 28, 2007 1:41 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

On Nov 28, 2007 12:34 PM, Travis Willard wrote:

...

Well, I think that's enough confirmation. :P

You sure? I dunno, I think we need maybe like 10 or 20 more still just to be sure!

If I confirm that I received 20 confirmations already, does that work? Can we do exponential confirmation?

Hey, please take my confirmation pleeeeezzzzz! :P -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)

received On 11/30/07, enderst wrote:

received

On Nov 27, 2007 12:53 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

_______________________________________________ aur-general mailing list aur-general@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/aur-general

got it On Dec 23, 2007 8:29 PM, Scott Horowitz wrote:

On Nov 27, 2007 12:53 PM, Aaron Griffin wrote:

...

This is a test of the new list name. If you get this message, please respond, to verify.

Thanks, Aaron

Hello Mr. Griffin,

I have received this message just fine.

Scott