[aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named downloads a while ago, and thus the package is outdated. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:12:42 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named downloads a while ago, and thus the package is outdated.
Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
It's out of date, but I don't know about outdated. You can still get release tarballs from Github.
On Oct 16, 2013 5:44 PM, "Doug Newgard" <scimmia22@outlook.com> wrote:
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:12:42 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named
downloads
a while ago, and thus the package is outdated.
Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
It's out of date, but I don't know about outdated. You can still get release tarballs from Github.
But the release tarballs reflect the current state of master, if I'm not mistaken.
----------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:58:25 +0200 From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
On Oct 16, 2013 5:44 PM, "Doug Newgard" <scimmia22@outlook.com> wrote:
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:12:42 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named
downloads
a while ago, and thus the package is outdated.
Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
It's out of date, but I don't know about outdated. You can still get release tarballs from Github.
But the release tarballs reflect the current state of master, if I'm not mistaken.
Nope, they reflect tags. You can get a tarball of master as well, but that's not what I'm talking about.
----------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:58:25 +0200 From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
On Oct 16, 2013 5:44 PM, "Doug Newgard" <scimmia22@outlook.com> wrote:
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:12:42 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named
downloads
a while ago, and thus the package is outdated.
Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
It's out of date, but I don't know about outdated. You can still get release tarballs from Github.
But the release tarballs reflect the current state of master, if I'm not mistaken.
Nope, they reflect tags. You can get a tarball of master as well, but that's not what I'm talking about.
As far as I can tell from the repo, the only existing tag is '1.0.6b', which makes the AUR package more recent. Am I missing something?
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:12:36 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
----------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:58:25 +0200 From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
On Oct 16, 2013 5:44 PM, "Doug Newgard" <scimmia22@outlook.com> wrote:
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:12:42 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named
downloads
a while ago, and thus the package is outdated.
Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
It's out of date, but I don't know about outdated. You can still get release tarballs from Github.
But the release tarballs reflect the current state of master, if I'm not mistaken.
Nope, they reflect tags. You can get a tarball of master as well, but that's not what I'm talking about.
As far as I can tell from the repo, the only existing tag is '1.0.6b', which makes the AUR package more recent. Am I missing something?
Just that the author is really bad at versioning. 1.0.8 in the AUR is from Apr 2011, the 1.0.6b tag is from Nov 2012, and 1.0.0 in the debian dir is from Mar 2013.
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Doug Newgard <scimmia22@outlook.com> wrote:
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:12:36 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
----------------------------------------
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 17:58:25 +0200 From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: Re: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
On Oct 16, 2013 5:44 PM, "Doug Newgard" <scimmia22@outlook.com> wrote:
----------------------------------------
From: florian@floriandejonckheere.be Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:12:42 +0200 To: aur-general@archlinux.org Subject: [aur-general] [rmlint] Package merge
Please merge rmlint [1] into rmlint-git [2]. GitHub dropped named
downloads
a while ago, and thus the package is outdated.
Thanks
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rmlint-git/
It's out of date, but I don't know about outdated. You can still get
release tarballs from Github.
But the release tarballs reflect the current state of master, if I'm not mistaken.
Nope, they reflect tags. You can get a tarball of master as well, but that's not what I'm talking about.
As far as I can tell from the repo, the only existing tag is '1.0.6b', which makes the AUR package more recent. Am I missing something?
Just that the author is really bad at versioning. 1.0.8 in the AUR is from Apr 2011, the 1.0.6b tag is from Nov 2012, and 1.0.0 in the debian dir is from Mar 2013.
Then rmlint should package the 1.0.6b version found on GitHub if it is indeed the most recent. No need to merge into the git counterpart. -- Maxime
participants (3)
-
Doug Newgard
-
Florian Dejonckheere
-
Maxime Gauduin