[aur-general] ardour-lv2

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra]. -- Philipp -- "Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan

Ray Rashif

1:13 p.m.

On 23 August 2010 18:24, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...

Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I was going to remove it, but I noticed one tiny difference: FFT_ANALYSIS=1 So until extra/ardour is built with that, the AUR package is still valid. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

Loui Chang

26 Aug 26 Aug

4:05 a.m.

On Mon 23 Aug 2010 19:13 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

...

On 23 August 2010 18:24, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I was going to remove it, but I noticed one tiny difference:

FFT_ANALYSIS=1

So until extra/ardour is built with that, the AUR package is still valid.

Not really. That's what ABS is for. That's not really the point of the AUR.

Ray Rashif

2:31 p.m.

On 26 August 2010 10:05, Loui Chang wrote:

...

On Mon 23 Aug 2010 19:13 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 23 August 2010 18:24, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I was going to remove it, but I noticed one tiny difference:

FFT_ANALYSIS=1

So until extra/ardour is built with that, the AUR package is still valid.

Not really. That's what ABS is for. That's not really the point of the AUR.

You're right. Something so simple like that just skipped my mind at that moment. Good it's been brought up, else I would've forgotten. My bad. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

Ty John (sand_man)

23 Aug 23 Aug

1:25 p.m.

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...

Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button. Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.

Ray Rashif

1:30 p.m.

On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) wrote:

...

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button.

Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.

Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference between the two different binaries would be whatever change is influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

Ty John (sand_man)

1:53 p.m.

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:30 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

...

On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) wrote:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button.

Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.

Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference between the two different binaries would be whatever change is influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS.

-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

I see. FFT is an audio visualisation tool. I guess this package probably shouldn't really be called -lv2 then.

Philipp Überbacher

2:03 p.m.

Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 13:53:51 +0200:

...

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:30 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) wrote:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button.

Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.

Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference between the two different binaries would be whatever change is influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS.

-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

I see. FFT is an audio visualisation tool. I guess this package probably shouldn't really be called -lv2 then.

When I created it, the [extra] package wasn't built with lv2 support (slv2 wasn't in [extra] either). It appeared sensible at the time, because lv2 support was the major difference. -- Philipp -- "Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan

Ng Oon-Ee

4:06 p.m.

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 14:03 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...

Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 13:53:51 +0200:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:30 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) wrote:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200:

...
I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button.

Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.

Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference between the two different binaries would be whatever change is influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS.

-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

I see. FFT is an audio visualisation tool. I guess this package probably shouldn't really be called -lv2 then.

When I created it, the [extra] package wasn't built with lv2 support (slv2 wasn't in [extra] either). It appeared sensible at the time, because lv2 support was the major difference.

\me goes to uninstall ardour-lv2 and update from extra =). Thanks, you're right, the lv2 support was the big difference. I recommend ardour-lv2 can be removed, since its not required anymore with [extra] having lv2 support.

Philipp Überbacher

4:24 p.m.

Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-08-23 16:06:54 +0200:

...

On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 14:03 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 13:53:51 +0200:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:30 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) wrote:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 12:24 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 12:13:11 +0200: > I noticed this package is currently unmaintained. > Can I adopt this?

Please do so, if you think it's still needed. I orphaned it because I lost interest in the program, but afaik in the meantime there's hardly a difference between this package and the one in [extra].

I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button.

Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.

Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference between the two different binaries would be whatever change is influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS.

-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

I see. FFT is an audio visualisation tool. I guess this package probably shouldn't really be called -lv2 then.

When I created it, the [extra] package wasn't built with lv2 support (slv2 wasn't in [extra] either). It appeared sensible at the time, because lv2 support was the major difference.

\me goes to uninstall ardour-lv2 and update from extra =).

Thanks, you're right, the lv2 support was the big difference. I recommend ardour-lv2 can be removed, since its not required anymore with [extra] having lv2 support.

Yeah, I did the same. The difference is small now and -lv2 is a misnomer now, so I'd also be in favor of removal. The [extra] PKGBUILD is good now and easy to modify anyway. -- Philipp -- "Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan

Thorsten Töpper

4:33 p.m.

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:24:06 +0200 Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...

Excerpts from Ng Oon-Ee's message of 2010-08-23 16:06:54 +0200:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 14:03 +0200, Philipp Überbacher wrote:

...
Excerpts from Ty John (sand_man)'s message of 2010-08-23 13:53:51 +0200:

...
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 19:30 +0800, Ray Rashif wrote:

...
On 23 August 2010 19:25, Ty John (sand_man) wrote:

...
I can't believe I didn't see the 'adopt' button.

Yeah I wasn't sure if it's the same or not. Does the one in extra support lv2 plugins? It doesn't seem to be specifically compiled in the same way. I'll keep it updated for now.

Yes, extra/ardour is compiled with LV2 support. The only difference between the two different binaries would be whatever change is influenced by having FFT_ANALYSIS.

-- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD

I see. FFT is an audio visualisation tool. I guess this package probably shouldn't really be called -lv2 then.

When I created it, the [extra] package wasn't built with lv2 support (slv2 wasn't in [extra] either). It appeared sensible at the time, because lv2 support was the major difference.

\me goes to uninstall ardour-lv2 and update from extra =).

Thanks, you're right, the lv2 support was the big difference. I recommend ardour-lv2 can be removed, since its not required anymore with [extra] having lv2 support.

Yeah, I did the same. The difference is small now and -lv2 is a misnomer now, so I'd also be in favor of removal. The [extra] PKGBUILD is good now and easy to modify anyway.

Removed. -- Jabber: atsutane@freethoughts.de Blog: http://atsutane.freethoughts.de/ Key: 295AFBF4 FP: 39F8 80E5 0E49 A4D1 1341 E8F9 39E4 F17F 295A FBF4

4997

Age (days ago)

5000

Last active (days ago)

List overview

Download

12 comments

7 participants

participants (7)

Ike Devolder
Loui Chang
Ng Oon-Ee
Philipp Überbacher
Ray Rashif
Thorsten Töpper
Ty John (sand_man)