In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and [svn2git-git][2].
At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git
The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git
I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name.
I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com:
In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and [svn2git-git][2].
At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git
The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git
I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name.
I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.
Sorry, forgot the link.
[1]:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55337 [2]:http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=37209
The projects names are same to the aur pkg's names, it's better to mention the diffrents in PKGBUILD's pkgdesc, not to change the aur names!
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com:
In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and
[svn2git-git][2].
At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git
The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git
I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name.
I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.
Sorry, forgot the link.
在 2012年2月19日 上午5:56，Alireza Savand alireza.savand@gmail.com 写道：
The projects names are same to the aur pkg's names, it's better to mention the diffrents in PKGBUILD's pkgdesc, not to change the aur names!
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com:
In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and
[svn2git-git][2].
At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git
The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git
I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name.
I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.
Sorry, forgot the link.
There may be a confuse.
https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git, http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git also can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git.There will be conflict.
As I mentioned, https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git is a ruby gem package, according to [Arch Ruby Gem Package Guildlines](https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines), the name can be set to ruby-svn2git and ruby-svn2git-git, this way, there will be no confusion and conflict.
One can have them both installed on a same machine.
Now it seems logical, so if they provides same pkg name on the system, yes these pkgs names have to change in the proper way
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com
在 2012年2月19日 上午5:56，Alireza Savand alireza.savand@gmail.com 写道：
The projects names are same to the aur pkg's names, it's better to mention the diffrents in PKGBUILD's pkgdesc, not to change the aur
names!
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com:
In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and
[svn2git-git][2].
At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git
The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git
I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name.
I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.
Sorry, forgot the link.
There may be a confuse.
https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git, http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git also can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git.There will be conflict.
As I mentioned, https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git is a ruby gem package, according to [Arch Ruby Gem Package Guildlines]( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines), the name can be set to ruby-svn2git and ruby-svn2git-git, this way, there will be no confusion and conflict.
One can have them both installed on a same machine.
在 2012年2月19日 下午5:52，Alireza Savand alireza.savand@gmail.com 写道：
Now it seems logical, so if they provides same pkg name on the system, yes these pkgs names have to change in the proper way
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com
在 2012年2月19日 上午5:56，Alireza Savand alireza.savand@gmail.com 写道：
The projects names are same to the aur pkg's names, it's better to mention the diffrents in PKGBUILD's pkgdesc, not to change the aur
names!
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com
2012/2/19 郑文辉(Techlive Zheng) techlivezheng@gmail.com:
In AUR, there are two svn2git packages, [svn2git][1] and
[svn2git-git][2].
At first, I thought that the later one is the git version of the first,then it turns out that they are to different packages.
The first one is Kevin Menard's ruby version, accturally a ruby gem. Here is the project page: https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git
The second one is Thomas Zander's c version svn2git, hosted on http://gitorious.org. Here is the project page: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git
I can't tell the deference between them, but I think it is better one of them changed to an other name. Condering the first one is an ruby gem package, so if it is better to change it to ruby-nirvdrum-svn2git or nirvdrum-svn2git in which nirvdrum-svn2git is the gem name.
I am not sure about this, so I post here to ask you guys' opinion.
Sorry, forgot the link.
There may be a confuse.
https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git, http://gitorious.org/svn2git/svn2git also can be package as svn2git and svn2git-git.There will be conflict.
As I mentioned, https://github.com/nirvdrum/svn2git is a ruby gem package, according to [Arch Ruby Gem Package Guildlines]( https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ruby_Gem_Package_Guidelines), the name can be set to ruby-svn2git and ruby-svn2git-git, this way, there will be no confusion and conflict.
One can have them both installed on a same machine.
I will try to contact the maintainer about this.
aur-general@lists.archlinux.org