April 2017 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7829] Orphan Request for isabelle
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

badcasa [1] filed a orphan request for isabelle [2]: out of date for >3 months, e-mail address of the maintainer is not working [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/badcasa/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/isabelle/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7830] Orphan Request for gdatafs
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

cdkitching [1] filed a orphan request for gdatafs [2]: This package has been broken for over a year (it will not build as the PKGBUILD lacks a package() function). Please either update it, or orphan it so someone else can take over maintenance. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/cdkitching/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gdatafs/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7891] Deletion Request for otf-fontawesome
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

elimik31 [1] filed a deletion request for otf-fontawesome [2]: This package is redundant because there is already an "otf-font- awesome" package in the aur. In additional, the install is broken, in line 9 "font- awesome-${pkgver}" should be replaced by "Font-Awesome-${pkgver}" (uppercase). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/elimik31/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/otf-fontawesome/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7896] Deletion Request for tlauncher
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

Prototik [1] filed a deletion request for tlauncher [2]: TLauncher isn't official launcher and even not legal launcher for Minecraft. It provides ability to run Minecraft without legal Mojang account, so it violates rights and Mojang's EULA (https://account.mojang.com/documents/minecraft_eula) I propose to delete this package and optionally ban next package submission for tlauncher (if those functionality exists). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Prototik/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tlauncher/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7914] Deletion Request for coati
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

jetm [1] filed a deletion request for coati [2]: Upstream software was renamed from coati to sourcetrail and I have created new AUR package for sourcetrail. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jetm/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/coati/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7915] Deletion Request for ezame-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

PhotonX [1] filed a deletion request for ezame-git [2]: Added a non-git package, since development is almost non-existent, the -git package is unnecessary. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/PhotonX/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ezame-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7916] Merge Request for python-dulwich
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

drrossum [1] filed a request to merge python-dulwich [2] into python2-dulwich [3]: I'd like to generate the python and python2 packages from a single PKGBUILD. I am the maintainer of both packages. Since the python3 packages as fewer votes (1 vs 107) it would make sense to merge this one into the other. Does that technically make a difference at all? [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/drrossum/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-dulwich/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-dulwich/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7921] Deletion Request for llvmlinux-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

TrialnError [1] filed a deletion request for llvmlinux-git [2]: Unknown project status (more or less idling as it seems from the ML). So the current patches and tools are for linux 3.x series. In my opinion it doesn't currently make sense to leave it on AUR, as it is broken anyhow. Today was my last attempt on fixing it, but due to the upstream status it is the best to remove it, until updated patches are available (and this git repo only vanishes from the surface) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TrialnError/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/llvmlinux-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7924] Deletion Request for nodejs-hexo
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

Jat [1] filed a deletion request for nodejs-hexo [2]: hexo-cli is the official binary package. hexo should not install independently. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Jat/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nodejs-hexo/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#7925] Deletion Request for rdcli
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 15 Apr '17

15 Apr '17

joachim [1] filed a deletion request for rdcli [2]: I would like just push master --force [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/joachim/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rdcli/

1 1