February 2019 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14018] Merge Request for livewallpaper
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Feb '19

02 Feb '19

Salamandar [1] filed a request to merge livewallpaper [2] into livewallpaper-bzr [3]: This package is now tracking trunk, so it should be renamed. I added the correct 'replaces' flag. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Salamandar/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/livewallpaper/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/livewallpaper-bzr/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13858] Orphan Request for armips-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Feb '19

02 Feb '19

Qyriad [1] filed a orphan request for armips-git [2]: The maintainer has not responded to any comments, and the package has been flagged as out-of-date as of 2018-11-11. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Qyriad/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/armips-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14017] Orphan Request for ruby-htmlentities
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Feb '19

02 Feb '19

mnussbaum [1] filed a orphan request for ruby-htmlentities [2]: The latest version of the upstream package was released in 2015 and the package is still not updated. I've asked the maintainer to update and not heard back. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mnussbaum/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ruby-htmlentities/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14015] Deletion Request for otf-sf-mono
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Feb '19

02 Feb '19

wafflefrisbee [1] filed a deletion request for otf-sf-mono [2]: this is a duplicate of otf-sfmono and didn't notice until after uploading. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/wafflefrisbee/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/otf-sf-mono/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14014] Deletion Request for lutris-beta
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Feb '19

02 Feb '19

VlinkZ [1] filed a deletion request for lutris-beta [2]: Please delete this package as Lutris has moved out of beta for the time being. I'll recreate this if Lutris ever makes another beta. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/VlinkZ/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lutris-beta/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#13843] Orphan Request for thunar-dropbox
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Feb '19

01 Feb '19

Jeinzi [1] filed a orphan request for thunar-dropbox [2]: I tried contacting Maato via email on 2018-12-18, but he didn't respond yet. There are two pull requests, one porting the package to thunarx-3, and one adding a requested feature. Given thunar-dropbox- git by twa022 already points at my fork, I'd be happy to adopt the package and support it. -- Julian Heinzel [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Jeinzi/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/thunar-dropbox/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14007] Deletion Request for vkd3d
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Feb '19

01 Feb '19

bruceutut [1] filed a deletion request for vkd3d [2]: available in community/vkd3d now [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bruceutut/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vkd3d/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14008] Deletion Request for lib32-vkd3d
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Feb '19

01 Feb '19

bruceutut [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-vkd3d [2]: available in multilib/lib32-vkd3d now [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/bruceutut/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-vkd3d/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14010] Deletion Request for arm-linux-gnueabihf-glibc-working
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Feb '19

01 Feb '19

eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for arm-linux-gnueabihf-glibc- working [2]: If this sort of rulebreaking *duplication* is why you think the package "deserves" to be in the official repos: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61600 Then you have so many thinks coming to you I'm not sure when to begin. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-linux-gnueabihf-glibc-working/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14009] Deletion Request for arm-linux-gnueabihf-binutils-working
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 01 Feb '19

01 Feb '19

eschwartz [1] filed a deletion request for arm-linux-gnueabihf- binutils-working [2]: If this sort of rulebreaking *duplication* is why you think the package "deserves" to be in the official repos: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/61600 Then you have so many thinks coming to you I'm not sure when to begin. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/eschwartz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/arm-linux-gnueabihf-binutils-working/

1 1