May 2019 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14821] Orphan Request for dive
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 May '19

03 May '19

nesadi [1] filed a orphan request for dive [2]: Maintainer hasn't responded to the package being flagged out-of-date in over a month. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nesadi/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dive/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14817] Deletion Request for fatresize
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 May '19

03 May '19

arojas [1] filed a deletion request for fatresize [2]: Moved to [community], thanks for maintaining [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/arojas/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/fatresize/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14813] Deletion Request for ungoogled-chromium
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 May '19

02 May '19

mrlx [1] filed a deletion request for ungoogled-chromium [2]: Unmantained [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/mrlx/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ungoogled-chromium/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14698] Orphan Request for libint2
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 May '19

02 May '19

dviktor [1] filed a orphan request for libint2 [2]: Package is too old [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dviktor/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libint2/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14812] Deletion Request for firefox-extension-tab-tree
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 May '19

02 May '19

dvzrv [1] filed a deletion request for firefox-extension-tab-tree [2]: Is incompatible with any recent Firefox versions and hasn't been updated for two years. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dvzrv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/firefox-extension-tab-tree/

1 1

[aur-requests] [DELETION] gtk-theme-windows10-git
by fabienwang 02 May '19

02 May '19

Hello, This package was orphaned today, I took it. But, there were several issues, the name, the wrong url & pkgver, the optional dependency to the icon theme... I've done it in a new package with correct name:windows10-gtk-theme-git Can you delete gtk-theme-windows10-git ? thanks

2 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14794] Orphan Request for ros-melodic-rospack
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 May '19

02 May '19

acxz [1] filed a orphan request for ros-melodic-rospack [2]: I have tried contacting the maintainer to try to fix the package but it seems to be a difficult job. I believe it might be wise to add a co-maintainer or even change maintainers for this package due to the difficulty of fixing this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/acxz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ros-melodic-rospack/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14804] Deletion Request for pkgbase
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 May '19

02 May '19

svito [1] filed a deletion request for pkgbase [2]: * Uses rm -rf to remove files in home directory * Uses pkgbase=pkgbase * Overwrites history of previous unrelated package * These comments were ignored for weeks by new package owner See also: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur- general/2019-April/035056.html [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/svito/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pkgbase/

1 1

[aur-requests] Dear all,
by fabienwang 02 May '19

02 May '19

Today, I wanted to help someone on an AUR package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/windows10-icons/ This person was very unpleasant, telling me to "f*** off", as you can see in the comments. The guy forces a ssh clone of the github sources, which is in my opinion not great, because a ssh clone forces users to be authenticated on GitHub, while an AUR package shouldn't force users to be authenticated, it should be always cloning using public https repositories. (I'm surprised that this is not a rule on the Wiki page of AUR : https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Rules_of_submissi… ) So, anyway, the guy just has this repository, not respecting "conventional" name for icon themes (they usually are named: nameofthetheme-icon-theme ), not respecting the convention that as it retrieves the latest version always, it should end with -git and moreover, not respecting users (and me). I want to ask if it's okay that I push my fixed version of the package. Also, what can we do against this package/user ? Thanks in advance. Best regards, fwhcat

2 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#14808] Merge Request for compiler-rt-lw-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 May '19

02 May '19

Lone_Wolf [1] filed a request to merge compiler-rt-lw-git [2] into lone_wolf-compiler-rt-git [3]: The name of the package should stay closer to upstream naming while still reflecting this is a special customized package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Lone_Wolf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/compiler-rt-lw-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lone_wolf-compiler-rt-git/

1 1