December 2020 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22861] Deletion Request for linux-zencjk
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

FredBezies [1] filed a deletion request for linux-zencjk [2]: Based on a dead kernel version. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FredBezies/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/linux-zencjk/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22860] Deletion Request for linux-openrgb
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

FredBezies [1] filed a deletion request for linux-openrgb [2]: Based on a dead kernel version. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FredBezies/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/linux-openrgb/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22871] Deletion Request for obs-studio-latest-release
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

tassiovirginio [1] filed a deletion request for obs-studio-latest- release [2]: I created a new package with a new name, according to the suggestions [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tassiovirginio/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/obs-studio-latest-release/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22853] Deletion Request for obs-studio-latest-release
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for obs-studio-latest-release [2]: Intentional duplicate of obs-studio in [Community] because that is out of date and someone can't wait. Don't even provide/conflicts obs-studio [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/obs-studio-latest-release/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22839] Deletion Request for neovim-nightly
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

quebin31 [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-nightly [2]: Looks like the upstream has stopped building the binaries. I would like to delete this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/quebin31/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/neovim-nightly/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22846] Deletion Request for bpytop-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

TheCynicalTeam [1] filed a deletion request for bpytop-git [2]: package has been added to official repo [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TheCynicalTeam/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/bpytop-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22837] Deletion Request for trenchbroom
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

clu [1] filed a deletion request for trenchbroom [2]: This package was flagged out of date in 2019... the software is on version 2020.2 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/clu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/trenchbroom/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22836] Deletion Request for python-django18
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

vicp74 [1] filed a deletion request for python-django18 [2]: This package was a dependency for one of my other packages some years ago, but now it's mostly pointless. A dubious package depends on it (see https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitbake/#comment-761107) so I don't think it serves any purpose. If you think it should not be deleted, please let me know and I could just disown it. Thanks in advance! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/vicp74/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-django18/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22834] Deletion Request for graceful-linux58
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

Scimmia [1] filed a deletion request for graceful-linux58 [2]: EOL kernel for a different distro [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Scimmia/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/graceful-linux58/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#22807] Deletion Request for openfoam-plus
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jan '21

03 Jan '21

dl6tud [1] filed a deletion request for openfoam-plus [2]: Dear Sir or Madam, the package openfoam-plus is a very old version of OpenFOAM - of June 2017. As a new version is released every 6 month, this package should be deleted. The up-to-date OpenFOAM software is available in the package openfoam-com, which I am maintaining with the help of the developers of OpenFOAM. Moreover, the OpenFOAM software was called "OpenFOAM+" only for a few years long ago. The recommended name today is "openfoam-com". Thank you very much, Norbert Weber [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dl6tud/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/openfoam-plus/

1 1