March 2021 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24152] Deletion Request for kodi-addon-pulsar
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for kodi-addon-pulsar [2]: Reported failing to build for almost 3 years now [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/kodi-addon-pulsar/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24354] Deletion Request for vim-coc-python-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

rmsc [1] filed a deletion request for vim-coc-python-git [2]: Seems that this package is not being maintained anymore. From their README: ``` WARNING: it's recommended to use coc-pyright if you're using python3 or use coc-jedi if you're using jedi, the code of coc-python is too hard to maintain! ``` [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/rmsc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vim-coc-python-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24353] Deletion Request for vim-coc-python-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

rmsc [1] filed a deletion request for vim-coc-python-git [2]: Seems that this package is not being maintained anymore. From their README: ``` WARNING: it's recommended to use coc-pyright if you're using python3 or use coc-jedi if you're using jedi, the code of coc-python is too hard to maintain! ``` [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/rmsc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vim-coc-python-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24368] Deletion Request for vim-coc-master-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

sainnhe [1] filed a deletion request for vim-coc-master-git [2]: The upstream releases their source code in a very different way: the default branch "release" doesn't contain any src, but only provides some precompiled javascript files, while the development branch "master" contains the typescript code that needs to be compiled. This package is based on master branch, but I realized that it doesn't match the naming rules, it should be named as "vim-coc-git" since it needs to be compiled from src. The current "vim-coc-git" is based on release branch which doesn't need to be compiled, I think it should be renamed as "vim-coc-bin- git". So I request to remove this package, I'm going to create "vim-coc-bin" and "vim-coc-bin-git" later. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sainnhe/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vim-coc-master-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24369] Deletion Request for neovim-coc-master-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

sainnhe [1] filed a deletion request for neovim-coc-master-git [2]: Same for vim-coc-master-git -------------------------------- The upstream releases their source code in a very different way: the default branch "release" doesn't contain any src, but only provides some precompiled javascript files, while the development branch "master" contains the typescript code that needs to be compiled. This package is based on master branch, but I realized that it doesn't match the naming rules, it should be named as "vim-coc-git" since it needs to be compiled from src. The current "vim-coc-git" is based on release branch which doesn't need to be compiled, I think it should be renamed as "vim-coc-bin- git". So I request to remove this package, I'm going to create "vim-coc-bin" and "vim-coc-bin-git" later. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sainnhe/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/neovim-coc-master-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24364] Deletion Request for rocm-smi
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

tpkessler [1] filed a deletion request for rocm-smi [2]: The package is deprecated (https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROC- smi). Its functionality is now part of the package rocm-smi-lib64 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tpkessler/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/rocm-smi/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24339] Merge Request for qt5-olm-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

lubosz [1] filed a request to merge qt5-olm-git [2] into libqtolm-git [3]: Since we also have libqtolm, libqtolm-git is the package name to use here. Otherwise `libqtolm` would need to be renamed to `qt5-olm` and all conflicts/replaces/prodides updated. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/lubosz/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/qt5-olm-git/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/libqtolm-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24341] Deletion Request for signon-ui-webengine
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

yan12125 [1] filed a deletion request for signon-ui-webengine [2]: The "webengine" branch mentioned in pkgdesc has been merged some time ago [1][2] and extra/signon-ui uses the latest upstream commit [3]. [1] https://gitlab.com/accounts-sso/signon-ui/-/merge_requests/3 [2] https://gitlab.com/accounts-sso/signon-ui/-/commits/master [3] https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit- packages/blob/packages/signon-ui/trunk/PKGBUILD#L8 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yan12125/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/signon-ui-webengine/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24126] Deletion Request for jellyfin-web-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

nasdack [1] filed a deletion request for jellyfin-web-bin [2]: To make the Jellyfin AUR footprint more consistent, I restored the deleted `jellyfin-bin` repository and wrote a new PKGBUILD in the manner of a split package, combining `jellyfin-web-bin` and `jellyfin- server-bin` into a single entity. I am the current maintainer of `jellyfin-web-bin` and `jellyfin- server-bin`. I was about to push my changes when I realized that I would have to first delete (or merge?) these packages before I could publish `jellyfin-bin`. Please let me know if this is a sound thought process, this is my first time maintaining a package of this size. Duplicate request filed for `jellyfin-server-bin`. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nasdack/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jellyfin-web-bin/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#24127] Deletion Request for jellyfin-server-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 26 Mar '21

26 Mar '21

nasdack [1] filed a deletion request for jellyfin-server-bin [2]: To make the Jellyfin AUR footprint more consistent, I restored the deleted `jellyfin-bin` repository and wrote a new PKGBUILD in the manner of a split package, combining `jellyfin-web-bin` and `jellyfin- server-bin` into a single entity. I am the current maintainer of `jellyfin-web-bin` and `jellyfin- server-bin`. I was about to push my changes when I realized that I would have to first delete (or merge?) these packages before I could publish `jellyfin-bin`. Please let me know if this is a sound thought process, this is my first time maintaining a package of this size. Duplicate request filed for `jellyfin-web-bin`. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/nasdack/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jellyfin-server-bin/

1 1