August 2021 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27149] Orphan Request for python-booleanoperations
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Aug '21

03 Aug '21

alerque [1] filed an orphan request for python-booleanoperations [2]: See comments on this and other related packages. Every single package but one (from the same OP) that depends on this (and several others I'll be requesting) are ones I maintain, and I'm tired of doing the work to maintain a fork so my packages build cleanly. I'd rather just maintain or co-maintain these so they work and follow Arch packaging guidelines. The issue with circular check dependencies has been commented on for over a year and other mentioned issues have not been addressed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/alerque/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-booleanoperations/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27150] Orphan Request for python-cffsubr
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Aug '21

03 Aug '21

alerque [1] filed an orphan request for python-cffsubr [2]: See comments on this and other related packages. Every single package that depends on this (and several others I'll be requesting) are ones I maintain, and I'm tired of doing the work to maintain a fork so my packages build cleanly. I'd rather just maintain or co-maintain these so they work and follow Arch packaging guidelines. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/alerque/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-cffsubr/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27372] Deletion Request for sad
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Aug '21

03 Aug '21

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for sad [2]: Package is in the community repository now. Thanks for maintaining! :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sad/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27371] Deletion Request for ruby-rb-fsevent
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Aug '21

03 Aug '21

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for ruby-rb-fsevent [2]: Package seems to be available in community. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ruby-rb-fsevent/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27240] Deletion Request for gnuarmeclipse-qemu-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Aug '21

02 Aug '21

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for gnuarmeclipse-qemu-bin [2]: Out of date for a few years, no maintainer activity. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnuarmeclipse-qemu-bin/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27226] Deletion Request for elasticsearch-py16
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Aug '21

02 Aug '21

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for elasticsearch-py16 [2]: Ancient specific version not needed by other pkgbuilds [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/elasticsearch-py16/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27370] Orphan Request for meli-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Aug '21

02 Aug '21

alerque [1] filed an orphan request for meli-git [2]: Original poster doesn't seem to have been around the AUR in ~6mo. I have a working PKGBUILD and would like to maintain this. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/alerque/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/meli-git/

1 2

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27366] Orphan Request for canon-pixma-mx495-printer
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Aug '21

02 Aug '21

ed_o [1] filed an orphan request for canon-pixma-mx495-printer [2]: The package hasn't been updated in 5 years, and I would love to adopt it [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ed_o/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/canon-pixma-mx495-printer/

1 1

[aur-requests] Why were my makepkg forks deleted?
by Hunter Wittenborn 02 Aug '21

02 Aug '21

As of this morning, it looks like the following packages I'm maintaining were deleted: - makedeb-makepkg - makedeb-makepkg-beta - makedeb-makepkg-alpha The reasoning for deletion for all three was as follows: "this package replace pacman with a empty file" This can be seen in the sources for the PKGBUILDs [1], but this was just a packaging mistake that was left over from the Debian releases of makepkg [2, 3] that I'm packaging (where pacman wouldn't normally be present). These appear to have been deleted in less than 24 hours of the deletion request going through, without me even having a chance to be able to fix anything. Is it OK if I republish the packages? I can fix the issue, but I'm not really sure what I did wrong in the first place that even deemed a deletion that quickly. [1]: https://github.com/makedeb/makepkg/tree/alpha/PKGBUILDs/AUR [2]: https://github.com/makedeb/makepkg/tree/alpha/PKGBUILDs/MPR [3]: https://github.com/makedeb/makepkg/tree/alpha/PKGBUILDs/LOCAL --- Hunter Wittenborn https://www.hunterwittenborn.com https://github.com/hwittenborn

2 2

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27350] Deletion Request for pidgin-emoticons-penguins
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Aug '21

02 Aug '21

micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for pidgin-emoticons-penguins [2]: fails to download file, downloads webpage instead, 0 popularity, orphan [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pidgin-emoticons-penguins/

1 1