July 2022 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#35947] Deletion Request for python2-sip
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

a.kudelin [1] filed a deletion request for python2-sip [2]: unmaintained and obsolete [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a.kudelin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-sip/

2 3

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36422] Orphan Request for ncurses5-compat-libs
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

tata [1] filed an orphan request for ncurses5-compat-libs [2]: maintainer seems inactive [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tata/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ncurses5-compat-libs/

2 2

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#36422] Orphan Request for ncurses5-compat-libs
by Marcell Meszaros 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

Hi @invidian, Please note that your reply was not received by the aur-requests mailing list because you are not a member on it. (Your emails sent to this list just get silently rejected and deleted.) But anyway, thank you for confirming that you are active as a maintainer. I've also observed that there is nothing wrong with this package so there should have been no basis for anyone to claim that the package would not be properly maintained. Cheers, Marcell On 14 July 2022 10:56:00 GMT+02:00, Mateusz Gozdek <mgozdekof(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Hey everyone, > >invidian here, ncurses5-compat-libs second maintainer. From what I see, the >package is up to date and I'm watching the comments for possible tasks. The >only recent discussion about the changes I recall was >https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1978673. > >I don't see a reason why it should be marked as an orphan. > >Regards, >Mateusz > >czw., 14 lip 2022 o 01:01 Marcell Meszaros <marcell.meszaros(a)runbox.eu> >napisał(a): > >> > maintainer seems inactive >> >> And what is the basis of that assertion? >> >> On 13 July 2022 23:23:24 GMT+02:00, notify--- via aur-requests < >> aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org> wrote: >> >tata [1] filed an orphan request for ncurses5-compat-libs [2]: >> > >> >maintainer seems inactive >> > >> >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tata/ >> >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ncurses5-compat-libs/ >>

1 0

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#36037] Deletion Request for python2-scruffington
by Marcell Meszaros 14 Jul '22

14 Jul '22

> Nothing depends on this package because you just had > the package that did depend on it deleted. I don't know what you are talking about. There hasn't been anything on AUR that would depend on python2-scruffington for at least two years now: https://web.archive.org/web/20200807153935/https://aur.archlinux.org/packag… On 29 June 2022 02:33:40 GMT+02:00, Keith Scheiwiller <k.scheiw(a)gmail.com> wrote: >Nothing depends on this package because you just had the package that did >depend on it deleted. >Strange how that works. > >On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 7:44 AM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > >> MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for python2-scruffington [2]: >> >> I suggest to delete this, since its mandatory >> dependency python2-sqlalchemy is gone, >> but nothing depends on this Python 2 module >> anymore. >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python2-scruffington/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36391] Deletion Request for pclish
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for pclish [2]: This package follows 0 packaging guidelines. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pclish/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36392] Deletion Request for pclish
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

g3tchoo [1] filed a deletion request for pclish [2]: doesn't follow almost any of the guidelines (using sudo, installing dependencies from pip, touching $HOME, etc) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/g3tchoo/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pclish/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36393] Deletion Request for pclish
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

HurricanePootis [1] filed a deletion request for pclish [2]: This package is totally stupid. It follows zero guidelines, and is just a series of copy and pasted commands in a singular prepare() function. It has no thought placed into it, and it shows. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/HurricanePootis/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pclish/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36420] Deletion Request for pclish
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

JaydenDev [1] filed a deletion request for pclish [2]: Community Request [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/JaydenDev/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pclish/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36401] Orphan Request for wiringop-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for wiringop-git [2]: Unmaintained. Flagged for broken build: 2021-01-03. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wiringop-git/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#36398] Orphan Request for ldm
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 13 Jul '22

13 Jul '22

MarsSeed [1] filed an orphan request for ldm [2]: Abandoned package. Flagged out-of-date (2020-09-05). [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/ldm/

1 1