June 2024 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[PRQ#60682] Deletion Request for peazip-gtk2 Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

Request #60682 has been Accepted by Muflone [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for peazip-gtk2. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

1 0

[PRQ#60684] Deletion Request for wechat-arch-linux Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

Request #60684 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: Indeed, really low quality package with questionable things (like git cloning a 3rd party repo in the package() function to install stuff from it in $pkgdir, questionable actions ran in the .install script, etc...). @linzeen Please, take a look at https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD & https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_package_guidelines For what it's worth, methods to install wechat on Arch Linux are already documented in https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WeChat [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

2 1

[PRQ#60668] Deletion Request for pack-cli-bin Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

Request #60668 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: Indeed a duplicate of the pack-cli package in [extra] (https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/pack-cli/) As pointed out by artafinde in this deletion request, this package was already deleted as part of [PRQ#60310] a few ago (https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur- requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/7H2QYUSQECMCD2IEAIT56DY7B3TVZP4P/#P5K7THJTKSEQYUAVEIGNNASJGMJDGD6W) @cncf-buildpacks Please, do not re-upload previously deleted packages (not without any prior authorization from the staff at least)! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

1 0

[PRQ#60679] Deletion Request for license-wtfpl Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

Request #60679 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for license-wtfpl. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

1 0

[PRQ#60681] Deletion Request for nfetch-bin Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

Request #60681 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: Maintainer actually seems inactive FWIW (Last Login: 2023-05-20 (CEST)) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

1 0

[PRQ#60685] Deletion Request for clever-tools-bin-beta Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 03 Jun '24

03 Jun '24

Request #60685 has been Accepted by Antiz [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for clever-tools-bin-beta. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Antiz/

1 0

[PRQ#60676] Orphan Request for winff Rejected
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Jun '24

02 Jun '24

Request #60676 has been Rejected by Muflone [1]: the package was udpated [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

1 0

Re: [PRQ#60669] Orphan Request for winff
by toropisco＠null.net 02 Jun '24

02 Jun '24

As maintainer, I have told this person repeatedly that I cannot help with the fact the Lazarus maintainer has declared a conflict in between QT and GTK+ runtime libraries. As I use GTK+ based desktops and window managers, I believe that it is my choice to support what I use. I have tried to create a.split package but for the life of me I can't make makedepends work on such It is a total fabrication that I have violated the code of conduct. My style is open and direct and in my 40 years on BITNET, UUNET and the Internet I have always had great interactions with people unless they try to behave like bratty children. This person in particular has an entitled antagonistic communication style and emotional attachment to irrelevant matters unrelated to technical issues. I am willing to accept a.comaintainer that can fix the split package problem if possible and if the solution proposed works to satisfaction, relinquish package ownership to said comaintainer. El 2 de junio de 2024 13:16:15 UTC, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org escribió: >xiota [1] filed an orphan request for winff [2]: > >This package has incorrect makedepends that is disruptive for some >users. Maintainer was notified multiple times by different users in >2021, 2023, 2024, but has refused to correct it, saying "Not my >problem". He has also been pushing misinformation and blaming Arch >Extra repo. > >I am not participating in comments because this maintainer has been >aggressively hostile toward me on numerous occasions, in violation of >Arch code of conduct. Nor am I flagging the package because the >maintainer previously intentionally introduced malicious behavior into >a package after it had been flagged. When I brought these complaints >to TU/PM, I was told that malicious packages are not a valid reason to >orphan. > >I am opening this orphan request because users are being negatively >affected by this maintainers' actions. Given the timespan that the >package has been in a poor state, it should be considered effectively >unmaintained and orphaned so someone can fix it. > >[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xiota/ >[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/winff/

2 1

[PRQ#60675] Deletion Request for pencil-v2 Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Jun '24

02 Jun '24

Request #60675 has been Accepted by Muflone [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for pencil-v2. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

1 0

[PRQ#60674] Deletion Request for eclipse-reporting Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 02 Jun '24

02 Jun '24

Request #60674 has been Accepted by Muflone [1]: [Autogenerated] Accepted deletion for eclipse-reporting. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Muflone/

1 0