June 2025 - Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[PRQ#73773] Orphan Request for pgadmin4-desktop
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Jun '25

21 Jun '25

tee [1] filed an orphan request for pgadmin4-desktop [2]: Flagged out-of-date since (2025-01-09) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tee/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pgadmin4-desktop/

1 1

[PRQ#73772] Orphan Request for pgadmin4-server
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Jun '25

21 Jun '25

tee [1] filed an orphan request for pgadmin4-server [2]: Flagged out-of-date since (2024-12-31) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tee/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pgadmin4-server/

1 1

[PRQ#73766] Orphan Request for isa-l_crypto
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Jun '25

21 Jun '25

fft [1] filed an orphan request for isa-l_crypto [2]: Package out-of-date for 5 months. I can maintain it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/fft/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/isa-l_crypto/

1 1

[PRQ#74128] Deletion Request for linyaps-box
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Jun '25

21 Jun '25

felixonmars [1] filed a deletion request for linyaps-box [2]: Moved to [extra]. Thanks for maintaining! [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/felixonmars/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/linyaps-box/

1 1

[PRQ#74038] Deletion Request for wine-wow64
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Jun '25

21 Jun '25

artafinde [1] filed a deletion request for wine-wow64 [2]: not required. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/artafinde/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/wine-wow64/

2 2

[PRQ#74109] Deletion Request for transphrase
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Jun '25

21 Jun '25

micwoj92 [1] filed a deletion request for transphrase [2]: Upstream repo no longer accessible. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/transphrase/

1 1

[PRQ#74121] Deletion Request for python-managesieve
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 21 Jun '25

21 Jun '25

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for python-managesieve [2]: Package in main repos now. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-managesieve/

1 1

[PRQ#74114] Orphan Request for waybar-git
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

matthewq337 [1] filed an orphan request for waybar-git [2]: Flagged out-of-date (2024-11-16) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/matthewq337/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/waybar-git/

1 1

[PRQ#74110] Deletion Request for mkinitcpio-utils Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Jun '25

20 Jun '25

Request #74110 has been Accepted by grazzolini [1]: Uploaded to AUR by mistake [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grazzolini/

1 0

[PRQ#74091] Deletion Request for purrcrypt-git Rejected
by AlphaLynx 19 Jun '25

19 Jun '25

> Request #74091 has been Rejected by bertptrs [1]: > > purrcrypt-git is the correct name for this package, purrcrypt should > be updated to not build from the latest VCS sources Hi Bert, The purrcrypt package does not build from latest VCS sources. It builds from a specific pinned commit using a fragment in the source array (currently 116f168 [1]). This follows the same pattern as packages in the extra repo like yubikey-full-disk-encryption [2], wlr-protocols [3], rapidcheck [4], and others [5] that pin specific commits because upstream does not yet have tags or release tarballs. In the case of upstreams like this, the latest release version is the latest commit to the main/master branch that changes the package. For these upstreams a -git VCS package should use a development branch. So, when upstream releases new commits on main that would change the package (if ever - it's been inactive for months), I will manually update purrcrypt's PKGBUILD to the new commit hash. This makes purrcrypt-git functionally identical to purrcrypt, as both would build the same commit. I've shared my more detailed thoughts on the VCS naming guidelines and why this is a duplicate in my comment on the purrcrypt package [5]. Am I understanding the guidelines correctly, or am I misinterpreting something about when the -git suffix packages are useful? Could you reconsider based on this clarification? Kind Regards, AlphaLynx [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=purrcrypt#n14 [2]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/yubikey-full-disk… [3]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/wlr-protocols/-/b… [4]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/rapidcheck/-/blob… [5]: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/search?group_id=11322&language%5B%5D=Shell&sco… [6]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/purrcrypt#comment-1029215

2 1