- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[PRQ#81235] Orphan Request for toxiproxy-cli-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

yochananmarqos [1] filed an orphan request for toxiproxy-cli-bin [2]: Flagged out of date for over a year. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/toxiproxy-cli-bin/

1 1

[PRQ#81234] Orphan Request for toxiproxy-server-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

yochananmarqos [1] filed an orphan request for toxiproxy-server-bin [2]: Flagged out of date for over a year. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/toxiproxy-server-bin/

1 1

[PRQ#81233] Orphan Request for nodejs-vite
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

Kimiblock [1] filed an orphan request for nodejs-vite [2]: unmaintained [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/Kimiblock/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/nodejs-vite/

1 1

[PRQ#81232] Orphan Request for mixo
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

yochananmarqos [1] filed an orphan request for mixo [2]: Flagged out of date for over a year. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mixo/

1 1

[PRQ#81231] Orphan Request for man-pages-tr
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

sherit45 [1] filed an orphan request for man-pages-tr [2]: The package has been flagged as out-of-date for a long time and currently fails to build due to incorrect md5sums and hardcoded file paths in the PKGBUILD. I have already fixed the PKGBUILD locally for the latest version (2.0.4) and I am ready to adopt and maintain the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/sherit45/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/man-pages-tr/

1 0

[PRQ#81227] Deletion Request for pfetch-rs-bin Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

Request #81227 has been Accepted by tippfehlr [1]: This package is now available in the [extra] repository: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/pfetch-rs/ Thanks a lot for your maintenance efforts so far, if you want to contribute to the package in the future you can do so via Merge Requests and issues on GitLab: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/pfetch-rs [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tippfehlr/

1 0

[PRQ#81226] Deletion Request for pfetch-rs Accepted
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

Request #81226 has been Accepted by tippfehlr [1]: This package is now available in the [extra] repository: https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/pfetch-rs/ Thanks a lot for your maintenance efforts so far, if you want to contribute to the package in the future you can do so via Merge Requests and issues on GitLab: https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/pfetch-rs [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tippfehlr/

1 0

[PRQ#81225] Orphan Request for zulip-desktop
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

tee [1] filed an orphan request for zulip-desktop [2]: Flagged out-of-date since (2025-09-04) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/tee/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/zulip-desktop/

1 1

[PRQ#81196] Deletion Request for pineconemc-launcher-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

yum13241 [1] filed a deletion request for pineconemc-launcher-bin [2]: To whom it may concern, I would like to first preface this with an apology for request "spam". The previous request was rejected for a lack of detail. I maintain two packages, "elyprismlauncher" and "elyprismlauncher-bin" (my packages). This package (the offending package), "pineconemc- launcher-bin", duplicates the second package. Now, the reason for the different naming is because upstream is undergoing a rename from "ElyPrismLauncher" to "PineconeMC". My packages were created before the rename, and the rename is still in progress, which is why I have not undergone standard AUR procedure for upstream renames yet. This package, besides being a duplicate, still does not name itself correctly (upstream does not call itself "PineconeMC Launcher", but simply "PineconeMC"), and shows telltale signs of being AI generated (such as out-of-place references to the user and ridiculous commenting), meaning the packager may lack the skills necessary to maintain the package, and this is a legal gray area for all things free/open source as the standard AUR PKGBUILD license is (the packager may have unintentionally used code incompatible with the license as a result of AI usage). The offending package has also caused confusion upstream over which package is "official" (upstream mostly approves of my package). I hereby request that the package "pineconemc-launcher-bin" be removed for the following reasons: 1. It is a duplicate of "elyprismlauncher" and "elyprismlauncher-bin". 2. It is clearly AI generated, which is both a legally-gray issue for the AUR, and shows the maintainer lacks the skills necessary to maintain the package, which means AUR guidelines are being disregarded here. 3. It has caused confusion upstream by both failing to consult with the original package's maintainer (me) and upstream. The maintainer also does not seem to check his/her/their/its email, as I attempted to resolve this by emailing the offending package's maintainer, to no avail. Thanks for reading, yum13241 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yum13241/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pineconemc-launcher-bin/

2 2

[PRQ#81223] Deletion Request for makesndwch
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 27 Apr '26

27 Apr '26

TheAidency [1] filed a deletion request for makesndwch [2]: Get rid of it pleases [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/TheAidency/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/makesndwch/

1 1