- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#34136] Deletion Request for vim-vi
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

garlicbreadwolfs [1] filed a deletion request for vim-vi [2]: Duplicate of vi-vim-symlink. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/garlicbreadwolfs/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vim-vi/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#34145] Deletion Request for vim-vi
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

ainola [1] filed a deletion request for vim-vi [2]: This is more appropriately managed via the user shell's PATH/configuration. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/ainola/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vim-vi/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#34140] Deletion Request for fx
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

alerque [1] filed a deletion request for fx [2]: Migrated to [community]. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/alerque/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/fx/

1 1

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#34142] Merge Request for vi-vim-symlink
by Doug Newgard 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:21:17 -0500 Pedro A. López-Valencia <palopezv(a)null.net> wrote: > I agree with you Doug. The package is a stop gap measure as is. The > issue at hand is that vi-vim-symlink has not been touched in 7 years and > uses a fancy shell function that is as of this month it is apparently > broken, see > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vi-vim-symlink#comment-860963 I think > my package is better precisely because it is a list of symlink creation > commands. Simplicity over fancyness. That's why I've already asked that > vi-vim-symlink be merged into my package instead. > > I will be extremely happy to see my package dissappear when the > maintainer of the vim/gvim packages in extra gets off his high horse > and acknowledges the needs of his users. But not before. The link you provided is wrong. There's no CRLF, there's no actual problem. Nothing is broken. The other package should not be merged into yours, yours should be deleted as a duplicate. It's also not all that great quality wise anyway, with the serious misunderstandings of how depends, provides, conflicts, and replaces work. > El 20/04/2022 a las 8:41 a. m., Doug Newgard escribió: > > On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:52:32 +0000 > > notify--- via aur-requests <aur-requests(a)lists.archlinux.org> wrote: > > > >> toropisco [1] filed a request to merge vi-vim-symlink [2] into vim-vi > >> [3]: > >> > >> vim-vi is a better maintained package that supports both vim and gvim > >> and covers all possible invoking names that emulate original vi > >> features. > >> > >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/toropisco/ > >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vi-vim-symlink/ > >> [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/vim-vi/ > > It's symlinks, there's not much to maintain. The whole vim/gvim thing is > > ridiculous, as gvim provides vim, making the gvim specific package useless. > > Maintainer was told this, but refused to even attempt to understand. If > > there's links missing they can be added to the originial package instead of > > making a duplicate.

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#34139] Deletion Request for python-cli_helpers
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for python-cli_helpers [2]: Package is in the community repository now. Thanks for maintaining! :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-cli_helpers/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#34137] Deletion Request for pgcli
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for pgcli [2]: Package is in the community repository now. Thanks for maintaining! :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pgcli/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#34138] Deletion Request for python-pgspecial
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

grawlinson [1] filed a deletion request for python-pgspecial [2]: Package is in the community repository now. Thanks for maintaining! :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/grawlinson/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pgspecial/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#33683] Orphan Request for perl-const-fast
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

micwoj92 [1] filed an orphan request for perl-const-fast [2]: Package misses 1 make dependency, was mentioned in comments already 3 times, first time being in 2015 [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/micwoj92/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/perl-const-fast/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#33676] Orphan Request for mingw-w64-poco
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

xantares [1] filed an orphan request for mingw-w64-poco [2]: dont want [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xantares/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mingw-w64-poco/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#33677] Orphan Request for mingw-w64-unixodbc
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

xantares [1] filed an orphan request for mingw-w64-unixodbc [2]: dont want [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/xantares/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/mingw-w64-unixodbc/

1 1