- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32621] Deletion Request for minio-mc-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

winlu [1] filed a deletion request for minio-mc-bin [2]: Since minio-client is now provided in community there is no need for this binary package anymore. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/winlu/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/minio-mc-bin/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32619] Deletion Request for hexedit0r
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for hexedit0r [2]: Abandoned fork of hexedit 1.2.12, last updated in 2013. Current Arch/community/hexedit is at v1.5. I suggest it's best to delete this outdated version. The fork's changes were only minor anyway from upstream hexedit. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/hexedit0r/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32616] Deletion Request for divxenc
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for divxenc [2]: Developer's SourceForge repo status: Abandoned. Last updated in 2014. From repo summary: "divxenc is not longer actively developed. Please use ffxvid". AUR has this successor: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ffxvid Safe to delete this package, nothing in AUR depends on it. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/divxenc/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32615] Deletion Request for lib32-coin-or-cgl
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-coin-or-cgl [2]: lib32 package but build links against 64-bit dependencies. Upon requesting fix from package owner, they just disowned it. I suggest it's safe to delete this package, nothing depends on it. Only 64-bit version is needed by open source mathemathics software like SAGE, and all those are hosted in Arch repos. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-coin-or-cgl/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32175] Deletion Request for dot-tools
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for dot-tools [2]: Personal script that clones his own dotfiles repo. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/dot-tools/

4 4

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32614] Deletion Request for lib32-fcitx
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-fcitx [2]: Orphaned package, not updated since 2016. There is zero demand for this lib32 package (seems it was dropped from Arch in 2015). Only dependent is obsolete AUR/lib32-sdl2-ime-support (abandoned 2016 patch/fork, since merged to upstream SDL2; deletion request submitted). Also SDL2 has built-in IME support now even without fcitx. Arch/multilib/lib32-sdl2 has no lib32-fcitx support but there is no feature request to re-enable fcitx in Arch bug tracker. So it's safe to conclude this package is not needed either in Arch or AUR repo. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-fcitx/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32613] Deletion Request for sdl2-ime-support
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for sdl2-ime-support [2]: Orphaned package, hasn't been updated since 2016. Source is an abandoned experimental fork of official SDL2, last commit is also from 2016. I've verified that the fork's IME patches have since been merged to upstream SDL2, so there is zero reason now to use this version. Safe to delete, nothing depends explicitly on this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sdl2-ime-support/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32612] Deletion Request for lib32-sdl2-ime-support
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-sdl2-ime-support [2]: Orphaned package, hasn't been updated since 2016. Source is an abandoned experimental fork of official SDL2, last commit is also from 2016. The fork's IME patches have been since merged to upstream SDL2, so there is zero reason now to use this version. Safe to delete, nothing depends explicitly on this package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-sdl2-ime-support/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32610] Deletion Request for lib32-isdn4k-utils
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

MarsSeed [1] filed a deletion request for lib32-isdn4k-utils [2]: Source gone, 64-bit package dropped. Can be safely deleted, nothing depends on this. Package last updated in 2017, seems there is no demand for this legacy ISDN utilities pack. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/MarsSeed/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/lib32-isdn4k-utils/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#32609] Deletion Request for element-web-bin
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 22 Feb '22

22 Feb '22

yochananmarqos [1] filed a deletion request for element-web-bin [2]: Duplicate of element-web community package. "The submitted PKGBUILDs must not build applications already in any of the official binary repositories under any circumstances. Check the official package database for the package. If any version of it exists, do not submit the package. If the official package is out-of- date, flag it as such. If the official package is broken or is lacking a feature, then please file a bug report." https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines#Rules_of_submiss… [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/yochananmarqos/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/element-web-bin/

1 1