- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27089] Orphan Request for jmonkeyplatform
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

miss_barfin [1] filed an orphan request for jmonkeyplatform [2]: haven't been updated in 2 years [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/miss_barfin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/jmonkeyplatform/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27088] Deletion Request for gnome-terminal-kali
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

FabioLolix [1] filed a deletion request for gnome-terminal-kali [2]: No one is interested in this pkgbuild, 0 votes in 5 years, the original uploader made only 1 update on 2016-07, I had made an update on 2018-12 and orphaned it; in the meantime no one flagged OOD or complained [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/FabioLolix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/gnome-terminal-kali/

1 1

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#27065] Orphan Request for freefilesync Accepted
by Amin Vakil 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

On 7/15/21 11:57 PM, Jochum Döring wrote: > Hi Amin, > > I recall offering you to join the list of maintainers, your reply: > > /Thank you for your quick response! // > //// > //Unfortunately I know very little about c++, so I'm not sure if I > could help much except testing the package and bumping the versions. // > //// > //I'm currently compiling gcc9 to see if that would fix the issue, > although I'm not sure if that's relevant or not, but as I've said > I'm clueless when it comes to c++. // > //// > //I was hoping if the package gets orphaned, someone who knows how > to fix the package and have time to fix it would come and adopt this. // > //// > //Best Regards, // > //Amin Vakil // > //// > //On 12/6/20 11:56 PM, Jochum Döring wrote: // > //Currently working on working on a fix, haven't heard from Simon > for while. // > //Amin if you feel you would like to contribute, i could add you as > a maintainer. // > //// > //Cheers, Jochum > > / > > Quoting yourself:/ > / > > /*"I was hoping if the package gets orphaned, someone who knows how > to fix the package and have time to fix it would come and adopt > this.*//"/ > > /// > /Since you already adopted the package yourself, i assume you have > acquired the skills in the past months to properly maintain the package? > > > Cheers, Jochum > > On 15-07-21 20:41, notify(a)aur.archlinux.org wrote: >> Request #27065 has been accepted automatically by the Arch User >> Repository package request system: >> >> The package base has been flagged out-of-date since 2021-01-02. > Hi Jochum, I will try a week to fix it and if I couldn't fix it, I will orphan it again. Best Regards, Amin Vakil

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27087] Deletion Request for pywlroots
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

dvzrv [1] filed a deletion request for pywlroots [2]: This package is now in [community] as python-pywlroots. Thanks for packaging! :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dvzrv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pywlroots/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27086] Deletion Request for python-xkbcommon
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

dvzrv [1] filed a deletion request for python-xkbcommon [2]: The package is now in [community]. Thanks for packaging! :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dvzrv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-xkbcommon/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27085] Deletion Request for pywayland
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

dvzrv [1] filed a deletion request for pywayland [2]: This package is now in [community] as python-pywayland. Thanks for packaging! :) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/dvzrv/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/pywayland/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27084] Deletion Request for sopcast
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

joaquinito2051 [1] filed a deletion request for sopcast [2]: Please, remove the package inmediately, because the download link is not available. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/joaquinito2051/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/sopcast/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27083] Deletion Request for tinyfugue
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

jkc [1] filed a deletion request for tinyfugue [2]: I plan on packaging tinyfugue v4 as well, so I'm replacing this with tf5. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/jkc/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tinyfugue/

1 1

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#27082] Orphan Request for python-ufo2ft
by Caleb Maclennan 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

Guillaume, Thanks for the response. I'm happy to provide patches, but to be honest I'm also still pretty frustrated. I provided a whole bunch of patches on your font tooling related packages over a year ago and only bits and pieces of them were applied. Many of the packages you later bumped without addressing the issues in my patches. Yes, there were some cosmetic changes (in many cases just matching the style in your other packages), but the things I *commented on* along with the patches were important issues reliable URLs, splitting build() steps from package(), fixing tests that wouldn't run, removing circular dependencies, etc. Some of these issues I submitted patches for are still outstanding over a year later. I'm attaching a refreshed patch to fix this particular package again. In case the list mangles or drops it you are also copied directly and I'll comment on the package with a fresh patch. After you look it over and check the wiki guidelines for Python packages and confirm that what I'm doing makes sense, please do reconsider adding me as a co-maintainer to your font tooling packages. Regards, Caleb On 2021-07-17 13:33, Guillaume Horel wrote: > Thanks for your concerns. Maybe you can submit a patch that fixes the > aforementioned issues, or better file a bug with upstream to improve > their test suite. The only patch that you sent made a bunch of cosmetic > changes and changed the download url, but as far as I can see didn't > fix any of the above. > > On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 11:27 AM <notify(a)aur.archlinux.org> wrote: > >> alerque [1] filed an orphan request for python-ufo2ft [2]: >> >> Besides OOD, this package has had long running issues with a check() >> function that does not run properly because of upstream issues: it >> uses an environment better suited to upstream regression testing and >> doesn't actually check against the Arch system libraries, while *also* >> mistakenly using arch system locale for the suite which blocks builds >> in clean chroots. I've reported this several times for more than a >> year and it still isn't fixed. I'd like to either maintain or at least >> co-maintain this to get clean chroot builds working. >> >> [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/alerque/ >> [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-ufo2ft/

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#27068] Deletion Request for abstouch-nux
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 17 Jul '21

17 Jul '21

acedron [1] filed a deletion request for abstouch-nux [2]: Abandoned. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/acedron/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/abstouch-nux/

1 1