- Aur-requests - lists.archlinux.org

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#18799] Orphan Request for papermc
by Gordian Edenhofer 10 Apr '20

10 Apr '20

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 9:17 PM Simon Gardling <titaniumtown(a)gmail.com> wrote: > For future reference, how can I better go about submitting a request and > contacting the owner of the aur package? I am willing to learn! > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:16 PM Simon Gardling <titaniumtown(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I almost forgot! Change the first sha512sum to 'SKIP' >> > The comment section for said package would be a good option. Plus, I put my e-mail address into the header of each and every PKGBUILD I maintain in case anyone wants to contact me in private. Please also see my previous messages on AUR requests. P.S. please bottom-post.

1 0

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#18799] Orphan Request for papermc
by Gordian Edenhofer 10 Apr '20

10 Apr '20

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 9:14 PM Simon Gardling <titaniumtown(a)gmail.com> wrote: > but it needs sed and jq (sed is already a depend) > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 3:13 PM Simon Gardling <titaniumtown(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I have an improvement to the PKGBUILD, how do I submit it? >> It's to replace the _pkgver and _build with: >> _pkgver=$(curl -L https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper/ | jq .versions[0] | >> sed -e 's|["'\'']||g') >> _build=$(curl -L https://papermc.io/api/v1/paper/${_pkgver}/ | jq | grep >> "latest" | sed 's/[^[:digit:]]\+//g') >> > This is not an improvement! No fair reading of my messages should have enabled you to come to the conclusion that I think fetching the most recent version is a valid option here! Btw. this is also not how this is supposed to be solved in a VCS package! There is a `pkgver` function for a reason... see [1]. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_package_guidelines

1 0

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#18799] Orphan Request for papermc
by Gordian Edenhofer 10 Apr '20

10 Apr '20

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:22 PM Simon Gardling <titaniumtown(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sorry, I am pretty new to the aur, and are still learning. > The ArchWiki is a great source of information for reading up on the AUR. A good start regarding your current issue and a very brief summary of how orphan request are handled may be found here [1]. > If my before mentioned suggestion is against the rules, would a package > like visual-studio-code-insiders not be allowed? They have a part in their > PKGBUILD to auto fetch the latest version. > I would put the `-insiders` suffix into the same category as a `-git` suffix as Microsoft uses their insider channel for rolling updates. Hence, IMHO the PKGBUILD fetching the most recent version is fine in this case. Please also note that even if you were to find a package in the AUR that would not follow the guidelines regarding the VCS naming convention (see [2]) would not mean it is okay to break them. > Regarding you saying that an orphan request is not a good way to engage in > this sort of discussion, it there a way to revoke my request? > I am not aware of an option to do so. [1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Flagging_packages… [2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_package_guidelines

1 0

Re: [aur-requests] [PRQ#18799] Orphan Request for papermc
by Gordian Edenhofer 10 Apr '20

10 Apr '20

On Fri, Apr 10, 2020, 19:53 Simon Gardling <titaniumtown(a)gmail.com> wrote: > There could be a script of some sort that gets the latest build and > downloads it. That's a good idea. > Dear titaniumtown, it is nice that you think this to be a good idea but actually it would be in conflict with AUR guidelines as this is not a package with a git (or equivalent) suffix. Hence, automatically building from the current HEAD would be against the AUR guidelines. However, feel free to upload such a package with the addition suffix. Note, papermc actually has a git repository from which the software can be build so it is absolutely doable. Since you have not mentioned or taken written note of any of my criticism about your request, I would like to again remind you again that an orphan request is an awful way of engaging in this kind of discussion. Please think about my previous response. Best regards, Gordian >

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#18813] Deletion Request for tensorboard-plugin-wit
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 10 Apr '20

10 Apr '20

trougnouf [1] filed a deletion request for tensorboard-plugin-wit [2]: provided by python-tensorboard_plugin_wit [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/trougnouf/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/tensorboard-plugin-wit/

1 1

[aur-requests] 145*90mm 4 to 15-year-old children. Disposable medical mask.
by COCO 10 Apr '20

10 Apr '20

1 0

[aur-requests] Kenny invited you and 1 other to his Google family group
by Google 09 Apr '20

09 Apr '20

[image: Google] Share entertainment & stay connected with your family ACCEPT INVITATION <https://families.google.com/join/promo/Hzp_zu9dHjLdbzytVluWchvKfaStaA> Kenny Andersen (uncoveranotherz(a)gmail.com) invited you to join his family on Google. Here are a few of the services he can set up for you to use together: YouTube TV family plan Google Play Family Library Google Family Calendar Google One To see all services available for your family group, visit families.google.com. ACCEPT INVITATION <https://families.google.com/join/promo/Hzp_zu9dHjLdbzytVluWchvKfaStaA> Google LLC 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA

1 0

[aur-requests] [PRQ#18779] Deletion Request for python-pytest-ordering
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 09 Apr '20

09 Apr '20

arisinfenix [1] filed a deletion request for python-pytest-ordering [2]: The python3 version is in [community]. When this deletion request gets accepted you can upload a python2 only version if still interested. Hopefully this is the right way to handle deletion requests for those python2/3 split packages that have a python3 but not python2 version in the official repos. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/arisinfenix/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/python-pytest-ordering/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#18784] Deletion Request for cartao-cidadao-svn
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 09 Apr '20

09 Apr '20

zezadas [1] filed a deletion request for cartao-cidadao-svn [2]: delete [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/zezadas/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cartao-cidadao-svn/

1 1

[aur-requests] [PRQ#18783] Deletion Request for cartao-cidadao-svn
by notify＠aur.archlinux.org 09 Apr '20

09 Apr '20

a36233 [1] filed a deletion request for cartao-cidadao-svn [2]: No longer updated newer versions available [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/account/a36233/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbase/cartao-cidadao-svn/

1 1